37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1444815 |
Time | |
Date | 201704 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Medium Transport Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Speedbrake/Spoiler |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying First Officer |
Qualification | Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 90 Flight Crew Total 1100 Flight Crew Type 170 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 90 Flight Crew Total 25000 Flight Crew Type 190 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Ground Event / Encounter Object Ground Excursion Runway Inflight Event / Encounter Unstabilized Approach |
Narrative:
Captain and I; first officer; reported for duty after 19 hours of crew rest. Preflight; flight planning and NOTAM briefings were completed for our empty part 91 flight. We concluded that all conditions were normal and within limits for the trip. We departed with myself as the pilot flying and captain as the pilot monitoring. We flew the visual approach with the ILS tuned and monitored. We had a stable approach on the localizer/glideslope from the FAF inbound to runway xx. Approach speed vref was 132 knots with our target approach speed of about 142 knots. The aircraft seemed to touchdown on runway xx within the touchdown zone. The nose was lowered as I extended the speed brakes; when the nose was firmly on the ground I deployed the thrust reversers. At this point the aircraft did not seem to be decelerating quick enough to make the normal turn off. Captain at this point assisted with manually braking and the thrust reversers. The aircraft proceeded to roll into the 'overrun' area of runway xx. After shutdown there appeared to be no visual damage to the aircraft except for a minor dent in the nose gear door and a slightly bent taxi light bracket; both due to contact with the emas (engineered materials arrestor system) material.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A medium transport flight crew reported a runway overran into the EMAS after landing.
Narrative: Captain and I; FO; reported for duty after 19 hours of crew rest. Preflight; flight planning and NOTAM briefings were completed for our empty Part 91 flight. We concluded that all conditions were normal and within limits for the trip. We departed with myself as the pilot flying and Captain as the pilot monitoring. We flew the visual approach with the ILS tuned and monitored. We had a stable approach on the LOC/Glideslope from the FAF inbound to Runway XX. Approach speed Vref was 132 knots with our target approach speed of about 142 knots. The aircraft seemed to touchdown on Runway XX within the touchdown zone. The nose was lowered as I extended the speed brakes; when the nose was firmly on the ground I deployed the thrust reversers. At this point the aircraft did not seem to be decelerating quick enough to make the normal turn off. Captain at this point assisted with manually braking and the thrust reversers. The aircraft proceeded to roll into the 'overrun' area of Runway XX. After shutdown there appeared to be no visual damage to the aircraft except for a minor dent in the nose gear door and a slightly bent taxi light bracket; both due to contact with the EMAS (Engineered Materials Arrestor System) material.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.