![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1450623 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201705 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | P19.Airport |
| State Reference | AZ |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Amateur/Home Built/Experimental |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
| Route In Use | Visual Approach |
| Flight Plan | None |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Climb |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Single Pilot |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Private |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 32 Flight Crew Total 130 Flight Crew Type 42 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Conflict NMAC Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
| Miss Distance | Horizontal 200 Vertical 200 |
Narrative:
I was on a visual approach to P19 for landing and was anticipating landing on runway 35 since the weather report favored that runway. At about 5 miles out; local traffic indicated that 17 was in use. I realized I was approaching from the wrong side of the field for 17 and needed to select a transition route. Turning immediately would have violated the class D airspace to the east; and crossing directly over the field at midfield would have required flying over a set of houses west of the airport that visiting pilots are asked not to overfly. I elected to cross over the field just south of runway 17 to avoid the two airspace issues. During this period; a cessna called that it was departing 17. I saw what I believed to be the departing traffic that had called on the CTAF and had heard only one aircraft call a departure. It turned out the aircraft I saw had not made a radio call; and the departing traffic that had made a call was still nearer the airport and below me as I transitioned from the west of P19 to the east. We passed much closer than intended; probably at 250-300 feet total separation. Neither aircraft took evasive action; but we became visible to each other just prior to the point of closest approach. The departing aircraft continued on course and I proceeded to land at P19 without further incident.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: GA pilot reported a near-mid-air-collision while maneuvering towards a non-towered airport when a departing aircraft had not announced departure on the CTAF.
Narrative: I was on a visual approach to P19 for landing and was anticipating landing on runway 35 since the weather report favored that runway. At about 5 miles out; local traffic indicated that 17 was in use. I realized I was approaching from the wrong side of the field for 17 and needed to select a transition route. Turning immediately would have violated the class D airspace to the east; and crossing directly over the field at midfield would have required flying over a set of houses west of the airport that visiting pilots are asked not to overfly. I elected to cross over the field just south of runway 17 to avoid the two airspace issues. During this period; a Cessna called that it was departing 17. I saw what I believed to be the departing traffic that had called on the CTAF and had heard only one aircraft call a departure. It turned out the aircraft I saw had not made a radio call; and the departing traffic that had made a call was still nearer the airport and below me as I transitioned from the west of P19 to the east. We passed much closer than intended; probably at 250-300 feet total separation. Neither aircraft took evasive action; but we became visible to each other just prior to the point of closest approach. The departing aircraft continued on course and I proceeded to land at P19 without further incident.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.