37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1452426 |
Time | |
Date | 201705 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737 Next Generation Undifferentiated |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Powerplant Lubrication System |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 272 |
Person 2 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 316 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe |
Narrative:
Upon receipt of the aircraft; the logbook indicated a previous day write-up for 'excessive oil consumption' on engine number 1. The signoff read; 'replaced magnetic seal; no leaks noted.' oil levels were: number 1: 88 percent; number 2: 100 percent. 1.75 hours into the flight; the number 1 was at 49 percent. I notified dispatch and we continued to monitor the oil loss. Later; 37 percent; and then later 28 percent. At one time I asked dispatch if they had a preference of action. He said that they had been looking at this long enough. They were ready for either. Operationally; it would be best to continue on [to ZZZ]; maintenance wise; it would be best to land in ZZZ1. We were estimating landing at ZZZ with 10-15 percent oil quantity. Not knowing at what point we might begin to experience temperature and pressure issues; combined with the possibility of landing single engine at a special airport with a 3.5 degree GS; the first officer; dispatcher; and I agreed that a divert to ZZZ1 was the most prudent decision. Landing was uneventful. Upon arriving at the gate; maintenance was about 99 percent sure what the problem was and thanked us for 'not toasting the engine!'
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737 flight crew reported a diversion due to engine oil quantity decreasing in flight.
Narrative: Upon receipt of the aircraft; the logbook indicated a previous day write-up for 'Excessive oil consumption' on engine number 1. The signoff read; 'Replaced magnetic seal; no leaks noted.' Oil levels were: number 1: 88 percent; number 2: 100 percent. 1.75 hours into the flight; the number 1 was at 49 percent. I notified Dispatch and we continued to monitor the oil loss. Later; 37 percent; and then later 28 percent. At one time I asked Dispatch if they had a preference of action. He said that they had been looking at this long enough. They were ready for either. Operationally; it would be best to continue on [to ZZZ]; Maintenance wise; it would be best to land in ZZZ1. We were estimating landing at ZZZ with 10-15 percent oil quantity. Not knowing at what point we might begin to experience temperature and pressure issues; combined with the possibility of landing single engine at a special airport with a 3.5 degree GS; the First Officer; Dispatcher; and I agreed that a divert to ZZZ1 was the most prudent decision. Landing was uneventful. Upon arriving at the gate; Maintenance was about 99 percent sure what the problem was and thanked us for 'not toasting the engine!'
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.