37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1460750 |
Time | |
Date | 201706 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 900 (CRJ900) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Electrical Distribution Busbar |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical |
Narrative:
We experienced a dc emergency bus caution message. We ran the QRH. The first line in the QRH for this event was 'land at nearest suitable airport.' we (the first officer and myself) discussed the situation and made a plan. We [advised ATC] diverted to [a nearby airport]. This gave us enough time to prepare the plane for landing. We asked ATC to roll the fire trucks as we no longer had any system fire protection and lost our dc emergency bus (electrical). I [briefed] the flight attendants. I made an announcement to the passengers that we were diverting due to mechanical issues. I ACARS texted dispatch to let them know our plan. We landed and taxied to the gate without further incident. We deplaned the passengers and shutdown the aircraft. I have a concern in this event. The tower controller cleared an aircraft to takeoff in front of me when we were at 500 ft. The aircraft was slow to depart. I queried the tower controller again if we had been cleared to land. Had that aircraft had any difficulties on the runway; we would have had to go around. No aircraft in an emergency that needs to 'land at nearest suitable airport' would like to accomplish a go around; for any reason. I understand the ATC description of the 'safe; efficient flow of traffic.' unfortunately in this event I believe 'efficient' took precedence over 'safe.' during normal traffic flow it would have been good work; but not during an emergency.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CRJ-900 Captain reported diverting to a nearby alternate after experiencing a DC EMER BUS caution message.
Narrative: We experienced a DC EMER BUS caution message. We ran the QRH. The first line in the QRH for this event was 'land at nearest suitable airport.' We (the FO and myself) discussed the situation and made a plan. We [advised ATC] diverted to [a nearby airport]. This gave us enough time to prepare the plane for landing. We asked ATC to roll the fire trucks as we no longer had any system fire protection and lost our DC Emergency Bus (electrical). I [briefed] the flight attendants. I made an announcement to the passengers that we were diverting due to mechanical issues. I ACARS texted Dispatch to let them know our plan. We landed and taxied to the gate without further incident. We deplaned the passengers and shutdown the aircraft. I have a concern in this event. The Tower Controller cleared an aircraft to takeoff in front of me when we were at 500 ft. The aircraft was slow to depart. I queried the Tower Controller again if we had been cleared to land. Had that aircraft had any difficulties on the runway; we would have had to go around. No aircraft in an emergency that needs to 'land at nearest suitable airport' would like to accomplish a go around; for any reason. I understand the ATC description of the 'Safe; efficient flow of traffic.' Unfortunately in this event I believe 'efficient' took precedence over 'safe.' During normal traffic flow it would have been good work; but not during an emergency.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.