Narrative:

We were on the ILS 26L to ont. At 1500 AGL; ATC advised of VFR traffic north of us. Simultaneously we got a TCAS RA to descend. I was the PF and I followed the TCAS guidance. I felt boxed in because the traffic was above us and we were being given commands to descend towards the ground at low altitude. I thought that the only way out was to turn left. As I descended I started a turn to the south. It was hazy and we were landing into the setting sun. Neither of us saw the traffic but the first officer did see the red RA at +100 and less than 1 mile. We got the TCAS 'descend' aural alert but no 'clear of conflict'. We got the 'glideslope' aural warning but no GPWS terrain warning. We were not stable at 1000 since we were below the glideslope. We were VMC and I remember thinking that if we weren't stable at 500 we would go around. We were stable and continued to a normal landing.this is a challenging approach for the B737. At takoe you are required to be at 210 kts 3300 AGL and only 12.7 miles from the field. I noted on the 10.7 pages that this is a high density VFR traffic airport and there is poor visibility in haze especially at dusk. This was certainly the case for us. The sun was directly in front and just below the top of the window frame. The glare made the approach difficult. Twice ATC asked us if we would prefer runway 26R. Both times we declined because we were already setup for 26L. The VFR traffic on final approach at low altitude added exponentially to the task load. The controller seemed unconcerned with the conflict. Meanwhile we were getting a TCAS RA to descend into the ground. I remember thinking: 'what's VFR traffic doing out here on final approach at this altitude?'

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B737 flight crew reported a traffic conflict while on final approach at ONT. While complying with TCAS commands the flight became temporarily destabilized on the approach; but recovered and made an uneventful landing.

Narrative: We were on the ILS 26L to ONT. At 1500 AGL; ATC advised of VFR traffic north of us. Simultaneously we got a TCAS RA to descend. I was the PF and I followed the TCAS guidance. I felt boxed in because the traffic was above us and we were being given commands to descend towards the ground at low altitude. I thought that the only way out was to turn left. As I descended I started a turn to the south. It was hazy and we were landing into the setting sun. Neither of us saw the traffic but the FO did see the red RA at +100 and less than 1 mile. We got the TCAS 'descend' aural alert but no 'clear of conflict'. We got the 'glideslope' aural warning but no GPWS terrain warning. We were not stable at 1000 since we were below the glideslope. We were VMC and I remember thinking that if we weren't stable at 500 we would go around. We were stable and continued to a normal landing.This is a challenging approach for the B737. At TAKOE you are required to be at 210 kts 3300 AGL and only 12.7 miles from the field. I noted on the 10.7 pages that this is a high density VFR traffic airport and there is poor visibility in haze especially at dusk. This was certainly the case for us. The sun was directly in front and just below the top of the window frame. The glare made the approach difficult. Twice ATC asked us if we would prefer runway 26R. Both times we declined because we were already setup for 26L. The VFR traffic on final approach at low altitude added exponentially to the task load. The controller seemed unconcerned with the conflict. Meanwhile we were getting a TCAS RA to descend into the ground. I remember thinking: 'What's VFR traffic doing out here on final approach at this altitude?'

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.