37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1478764 |
Time | |
Date | 201709 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | LOM.Airport |
State Reference | PA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft Low Wing 1 Eng Fixed Gear |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | None |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft High Wing 1 Eng Fixed Gear |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Person 1 | |
Function | Single Pilot Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Private |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 5 Flight Crew Total 550 Flight Crew Type 500 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Conflict NMAC |
Miss Distance | Horizontal 400 Vertical 200 |
Narrative:
I was performing pattern work at LOM. Although there was a moderate amount of commercial and private traffic; no sequencing problems arose until aircraft Y ignored my radio calls that I was turning left downwind and took advantage of an altitude below the standard 1500 feet pattern at LOM to pass my aircraft after I was established on left downwind. I expressed surprise over the radio but was met only with laughter. Aircraft Y continued ahead of me and landed at LOM. After landing; I asked the pilot why he cut me off in the pattern. His excuse was 'you were above pattern altitude.' I am based at LOM and hold pattern altitude religiously once turning downwind from the upwind/crosswind climb. He was at perhaps 1300 feet. I made a corrective maneuver and did not attempt to reassert my position as #1 in the pattern. On the ground; his passenger stated 'you only announced left crosswind;' a lie; as the crew at LOM (who heard the incident on the radio) always joke with me for announcing my every turn and position. The pilot did not respond when I quoted the far that states an aircraft at a lower altitude (in this case; deliberately below the official pattern altitude at LOM) shall not take advantage of that fact to cut off another aircraft [on final; but this goes for any leg of the pattern.]I think my hands have finally stopped shaking. A student pilot with fewer hours would have been traumatized by the close call.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: GA pilot reported on downwind at LOM being passed underneath by another GA aircraft that continued on to a landing that required a corrective maneuver for separation.
Narrative: I was performing pattern work at LOM. Although there was a moderate amount of commercial and private traffic; no sequencing problems arose until Aircraft Y ignored my radio calls that I was turning left downwind and took advantage of an altitude below the standard 1500 feet pattern at LOM to pass my aircraft AFTER I was established on left downwind. I expressed surprise over the radio but was met only with laughter. Aircraft Y continued ahead of me and landed at LOM. After landing; I asked the pilot why he cut me off in the pattern. His excuse was 'you were above pattern altitude.' I am based at LOM and hold pattern altitude religiously once turning downwind from the upwind/crosswind climb. He was at perhaps 1300 feet. I made a corrective maneuver and did not attempt to reassert my position as #1 in the pattern. On the ground; his passenger stated 'you only announced left crosswind;' a lie; as the crew at LOM (who heard the incident on the radio) always joke with me for announcing my every turn and position. The pilot did not respond when I quoted the FAR that states an aircraft at a lower altitude (in this case; deliberately below the official pattern altitude at LOM) shall NOT take advantage of that fact to cut off another aircraft [on final; but this goes for any leg of the pattern.]I think my hands have finally stopped shaking. A student pilot with fewer hours would have been traumatized by the close call.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.