37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1498021 |
Time | |
Date | 201711 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | K90.TRACON |
State Reference | MA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Small Transport Low Wing 2 Recip Eng |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Route In Use | VFR Route |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Small Transport Low Wing 2 Recip Eng |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Route In Use | None |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Approach |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Experience | Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 2 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict NMAC Deviation - Procedural Other / Unknown |
Narrative:
Aircraft X requested VFR flight following for a short flight from at 1;000 feet. The pilot had opposite direction VFR traffic indicating 800 feet. I issued the traffic at 8 miles. Aircraft X did not have the traffic in sight. The VFR aircraft indicated level at 800 feet so at 5 miles I reissued the traffic and suggested a VFR climb if not in sight. Aircraft X did not have the traffic in sight and executed a climb to 1;500 feet. At 3 miles; I reissued the traffic and advised the pilot that the targets appeared likely to merge. The pilot did not request a vector for the traffic. Aircraft X then reported the traffic in sight at his same altitude of 1;500 feet; and not at the indicated 800 feet. During the time both before and after the conflict; the VFR traffic showed single sweep altitude changes to altitudes of 1;200; 1;600; and 1;700 feet; very infrequently.I should have issued proactive vectors to de-conflict the traffic situation since both altitudes were not verified.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: K90 TRACON Controller reported an unidentified VFR aircraft was a NMAC with a VFR aircraft the Controller was working.
Narrative: Aircraft X requested VFR flight following for a short flight from at 1;000 feet. The pilot had opposite direction VFR traffic indicating 800 feet. I issued the traffic at 8 miles. Aircraft X did not have the traffic in sight. The VFR aircraft indicated level at 800 feet so at 5 miles I reissued the traffic and suggested a VFR climb if not in sight. Aircraft X did not have the traffic in sight and executed a climb to 1;500 feet. At 3 miles; I reissued the traffic and advised the pilot that the targets appeared likely to merge. The pilot did not request a vector for the traffic. Aircraft X then reported the traffic in sight at his same altitude of 1;500 feet; and not at the indicated 800 feet. During the time both before and after the conflict; the VFR traffic showed single sweep altitude changes to altitudes of 1;200; 1;600; and 1;700 feet; very infrequently.I should have issued proactive vectors to de-conflict the traffic situation since both altitudes were not verified.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.