37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1506657 |
Time | |
Date | 201712 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | RVJ.Airport |
State Reference | GA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Bonanza 33 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Route In Use | Direct |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Function | Single Pilot |
Qualification | Flight Crew Private |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 12 Flight Crew Total 400 Flight Crew Type 300 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Ground Incursion Runway Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence |
Narrative:
I was enroute; VFR 8500 feet [and] entered pattern for runway 28 at my planned destination. Below 1000 feet; the winds were substantial and variable; gusting to 30kts. Although I am proficient and comfortable with crosswind/gusts; the conditions were outside my personal safety limits. I immediately went missed when it was clear that I would not be able to land there. I went direct to krvj; an airport I am familiar with and comfortable landing from prior arrivals. Due to the turbulence at enroute altitude (approximately 1500 feet); I was unable to check NOTAMS at rvj. Due to turbulence; I could not devote full attention to foreflight to verify NOTAMS; as I was trying to safely fly the plane in the aggressive winds.on short final; approximately 200 feet AGL; I noticed a very small 'X' in the runoff area. I believe it meant that the run off was closed; not the airport or the runway. I have seen the 'X' actually on the runway; blocking the runway at other airports; indicating a closed runway. After landing safely; I noticed the NOTAM in foreflight. I believe that the severe low-level turbulence and strong winds prevented me from checking NOTAMS in an airport that I did not intend on landing. On short final; had the 'X' (runway closed) been more prominent; I would have recognized it as the runway closed; rather than the overrun closed. I had not intended to land at rvj; it was an in-flight safety decision due to the extreme winds at intended destination.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Beechcraft Bonanza pilot reported landing on closed runway in turbulent; gusty conditions. Runway closure marking was incorrect and unclear. Pilot exercised Part 91.3 authority safety decision.
Narrative: I was enroute; VFR 8500 feet [and] entered pattern for runway 28 at my planned destination. Below 1000 feet; the winds were substantial and variable; gusting to 30kts. Although I am proficient and comfortable with crosswind/gusts; the conditions were outside my personal safety limits. I immediately went missed when it was clear that I would not be able to land there. I went direct to KRVJ; an airport I am familiar with and comfortable landing from prior arrivals. Due to the turbulence at enroute altitude (approximately 1500 feet); I was unable to check NOTAMS at RVJ. Due to turbulence; I could not devote full attention to ForeFlight to verify NOTAMS; as I was trying to safely fly the plane in the aggressive winds.On short final; approximately 200 feet AGL; I noticed a VERY SMALL 'X' in the runoff area. I believe it meant that the run off was closed; not the airport or the runway. I have seen the 'X' actually on the runway; blocking the runway at other airports; indicating a closed runway. After landing safely; I noticed the NOTAM in ForeFlight. I believe that the severe low-level turbulence and strong winds prevented me from checking NOTAMS in an airport that I did not intend on landing. On short final; had the 'X' (runway closed) been more prominent; I would have recognized it as the runway closed; rather than the overrun closed. I had not intended to land at RVJ; it was an in-flight safety decision due to the extreme winds at intended destination.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.