37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1516426 |
Time | |
Date | 201802 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | Us |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | A319 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Parked |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Fuel Distribution System |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Total 8335 Flight Crew Type 3289 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Maintenance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Ground Event / Encounter Other / Unknown |
Narrative:
When the move team pulled the aircraft to the gate; the first thing I noticed was a nonstandard fuel panel configuration. Both right fuel pumps were on and displaying a fault and the cross feed valve was open. There were multiple electronic centralized aircraft monitor (ECAM) cautions related to the right fuel pumps faults and low pressures as right wing fuel tank was completely empty. The plane also had a 10000-pound fuel imbalance...all fuel was in the inner tank of the left wing. First problem is; how did this happen? Second problem; was a checklist even followed by the move team? To have such an abnormal fuel configuration should be a red flag to anyone with the slightest knowledge of airplane systems. I talked with maintenance control and had a mechanic come out to see the condition the plane was brought to the gate in and to help the fueler with the imbalance. That mechanic indicated the plane should not have been moved with all the ECAM cautions and the extreme imbalance...both things I cannot confirm to be true; but I would not have taxied the plane in this configuration.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A319 Captain reported that the Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitor; ECAM; indicated a massive fuel imbalance: Captain questioned the tow procedures under such a state.
Narrative: When the move team pulled the aircraft to the gate; the first thing I noticed was a nonstandard fuel panel configuration. Both right fuel pumps were on and displaying a fault and the cross feed valve was open. There were multiple Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitor (ECAM) cautions related to the right fuel pumps faults and low pressures as right wing fuel tank was completely empty. The plane also had a 10000-pound fuel imbalance...all fuel was in the inner tank of the left wing. First problem is; how did this happen? Second problem; was a checklist even followed by the move team? To have such an abnormal fuel configuration should be a red flag to anyone with the slightest knowledge of airplane systems. I talked with Maintenance Control and had a mechanic come out to see the condition the plane was brought to the gate in and to help the fueler with the imbalance. That mechanic indicated the plane should not have been moved with all the ECAM cautions and the extreme imbalance...both things I cannot confirm to be true; but I would not have taxied the plane in this configuration.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.