Narrative:

Our aircraft had an MEL on the altitude alert warning system. I was cleared on course and up to 7000'. Aft climb rate was in excess of 2000 FPM when I noticed I had exceeded 7000' by 800'. I immediately placed transponder in standby. Went to flight idle power and quickly returned to 7000'. Departure at sjt has no radar and upon contacting ZFW (126.15) no violation was stated by the controller. As pilots, we begin to rely on our equipment, patterns develop and when the standard situation changes, mistakes are made. If the altitude alert had been working, we would not have busted the altitude. I realize we are responsible for our use of the quip. However, I do not think that safety devices should be allowed to be MEL'd.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ALT ALERT MINIMUM EQUIPMENT LISTED. ALT DEVIATION ON CLIMBOUT.

Narrative: OUR ACFT HAD AN MEL ON THE ALT ALERT WARNING SYS. I WAS CLRED ON COURSE AND UP TO 7000'. AFT CLB RATE WAS IN EXCESS OF 2000 FPM WHEN I NOTICED I HAD EXCEEDED 7000' BY 800'. I IMMEDIATELY PLACED XPONDER IN STANDBY. WENT TO FLT IDLE PWR AND QUICKLY RETURNED TO 7000'. DEP AT SJT HAS NO RADAR AND UPON CONTACTING ZFW (126.15) NO VIOLATION WAS STATED BY THE CTLR. AS PLTS, WE BEGIN TO RELY ON OUR EQUIP, PATTERNS DEVELOP AND WHEN THE STANDARD SITUATION CHANGES, MISTAKES ARE MADE. IF THE ALT ALERT HAD BEEN WORKING, WE WOULD NOT HAVE BUSTED THE ALT. I REALIZE WE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR USE OF THE QUIP. HOWEVER, I DO NOT THINK THAT SAFETY DEVICES SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO BE MEL'D.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.