37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 153622 |
Time | |
Date | 199008 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : ors |
State Reference | WA |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : dal |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, Low Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff |
Flight Plan | None |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, Low Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 15 flight time total : 450 flight time type : 120 |
ASRS Report | 153622 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 50 vertical : 50 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
I flew to a fly-in information with 2 other fly-baby type homebuilts. During takeoffs, we had been departing in rapid succession, leader down center of runway, #2 down left side and #3 (me) on right SID of runway. A similar departure was to be made from east sound airport. Incoming traffic was heavy, leaving only small gaps for departure. After a champ landed, the flight leader taxied onto the active and we followed. Due to our tail-dragger confign, the view forward was limited. The leader waited a few moments, then applied takeoff power. When he lifted his tail, he discovered the champ had missed the center turnoff and was still on the runway. #1 throttled back. #2 also throttled back, but his plane darted to the right into my path. About this time, I raised my tail and discovered the problem. I decided my options were few, and maintained takeoff power (my aircraft had a larger engine). I broke ground and slid to the right to the edge of the runway. #2 recovered control and moved back left. I passed #2 about the time he broke ground, about 50' above and 50' to the side. Contributing factors: 1) lead aircraft commander did not have a lead mentality to consider the effect his actions would have on flight members. 2) inexperience by #2--kept too much rudder on during power reduction. 3) poor judgement by #3 (me) in not recognizing and compensating for #1 and #2.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FORMATION FLT OF 3 ON TKOF DISCOVER LNDG ACFT STILL ON RWY. LEADER POWERS BACK, CREATES NMAC SITUATION.
Narrative: I FLEW TO A FLY-IN INFO WITH 2 OTHER FLY-BABY TYPE HOMEBUILTS. DURING TKOFS, WE HAD BEEN DEPARTING IN RAPID SUCCESSION, LEADER DOWN CENTER OF RWY, #2 DOWN LEFT SIDE AND #3 (ME) ON RIGHT SID OF RWY. A SIMILAR DEP WAS TO BE MADE FROM E SOUND ARPT. INCOMING TFC WAS HVY, LEAVING ONLY SMALL GAPS FOR DEP. AFTER A CHAMP LANDED, THE FLT LEADER TAXIED ONTO THE ACTIVE AND WE FOLLOWED. DUE TO OUR TAIL-DRAGGER CONFIGN, THE VIEW FORWARD WAS LIMITED. THE LEADER WAITED A FEW MOMENTS, THEN APPLIED TKOF PWR. WHEN HE LIFTED HIS TAIL, HE DISCOVERED THE CHAMP HAD MISSED THE CENTER TURNOFF AND WAS STILL ON THE RWY. #1 THROTTLED BACK. #2 ALSO THROTTLED BACK, BUT HIS PLANE DARTED TO THE RIGHT INTO MY PATH. ABOUT THIS TIME, I RAISED MY TAIL AND DISCOVERED THE PROB. I DECIDED MY OPTIONS WERE FEW, AND MAINTAINED TKOF PWR (MY ACFT HAD A LARGER ENG). I BROKE GND AND SLID TO THE RIGHT TO THE EDGE OF THE RWY. #2 RECOVERED CTL AND MOVED BACK LEFT. I PASSED #2 ABOUT THE TIME HE BROKE GND, ABOUT 50' ABOVE AND 50' TO THE SIDE. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS: 1) LEAD ACFT COMMANDER DID NOT HAVE A LEAD MENTALITY TO CONSIDER THE EFFECT HIS ACTIONS WOULD HAVE ON FLT MEMBERS. 2) INEXPERIENCE BY #2--KEPT TOO MUCH RUDDER ON DURING PWR REDUCTION. 3) POOR JUDGEMENT BY #3 (ME) IN NOT RECOGNIZING AND COMPENSATING FOR #1 AND #2.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.