37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1543797 |
Time | |
Date | 201805 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Dawn |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Flap Control (Trailing & Leading Edge) |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 225 Flight Crew Type 1029 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying First Officer |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Total 7551 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe |
Narrative:
After a normal flaps 5 takeoff and noise abatement climbout from ZZZ; when the flaps were retracted the flaps moved up to approximately 3.0 degrees on the left and 4.5 degrees on the right side and locked. After advising ATC of the problem and stating that we needed 220 knots and below FL200 we entered the checklist. It directed us to use the flaps alternate system to put the flaps down to 15 degrees for landing. [Advised ATC] of flight control malfunction. Once the checklist was complete; ATC; dispatch; the flight attendants and passengers were advised of our intention to divert to ZZZ1. ATC vectored us to a straight in approach for landing. Once clear of the runway the fire/crash crew inspected the airplane and released us to the gate.the flap speed; altitude and G limits were not exceeded; there was no uncommanded roll and the landing was not overweight. The only problem was in deciding the correct checklist to use. Since both checklists and initial conditions weren't completely correct we had to slow down and read them both fully. This took about 4-6 minutes extra between passenger/flight attendant/dispatch/ATC vector calls etc. Once the correct checklist was entered (based on no uncommanded roll) things went smoothly; approach speeds computed; flaps extended and a flaps 15 landing performed.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737 flight crew reported a flap system malfunction during initial climbout resulting in a diversion.
Narrative: After a normal flaps 5 takeoff and noise abatement climbout from ZZZ; when the flaps were retracted the flaps moved up to approximately 3.0 degrees on the left and 4.5 degrees on the right side and locked. After advising ATC of the problem and stating that we needed 220 knots and below FL200 we entered the checklist. It directed us to use the flaps alternate system to put the flaps down to 15 degrees for landing. [Advised ATC] of flight control malfunction. Once the checklist was complete; ATC; dispatch; the flight attendants and passengers were advised of our intention to divert to ZZZ1. ATC vectored us to a straight in approach for landing. Once clear of the runway the Fire/Crash Crew inspected the airplane and released us to the gate.The flap speed; altitude and G limits were not exceeded; there was no uncommanded roll and the landing was not overweight. The only problem was in deciding the correct checklist to use. Since both checklists and initial conditions weren't completely correct we had to slow down and read them both fully. This took about 4-6 minutes extra between passenger/Flight Attendant/Dispatch/ATC vector calls etc. Once the correct checklist was entered (based on no uncommanded roll) things went smoothly; approach speeds computed; flaps extended and a flaps 15 landing performed.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.