Narrative:

While conducting practice ILS approachs to mry 10R, on 2 occasions we were not handed off properly from approach to tower frequency. This did not result in a loss of sep but did cause delays for departing aircraft. The same event also occurred during 1 practice ILS approach to sjc. In all 3 cases, the approach frequency was moderately busy, but not congested. Suggest that more emphasis be placed upon proper handoffs from approach to tower frequencys when conducting practice approachs, and that pilots be prepared to switch to tower frequency in any case when reaching the FAF. I would also comment that cfii as opposed to qualified safety pilots who are not cfii's are better able to catch a missed handoff while a pilot is practicing an approach.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: PLT REPORTS INADEQUATE HANDOFF PROC FROM TRACON TO TWR DURING 3 PRACTICE INS APCHS.

Narrative: WHILE CONDUCTING PRACTICE ILS APCHS TO MRY 10R, ON 2 OCCASIONS WE WERE NOT HANDED OFF PROPERLY FROM APCH TO TWR FREQ. THIS DID NOT RESULT IN A LOSS OF SEP BUT DID CAUSE DELAYS FOR DEPARTING ACFT. THE SAME EVENT ALSO OCCURRED DURING 1 PRACTICE ILS APCH TO SJC. IN ALL 3 CASES, THE APCH FREQ WAS MODERATELY BUSY, BUT NOT CONGESTED. SUGGEST THAT MORE EMPHASIS BE PLACED UPON PROPER HDOFS FROM APCH TO TWR FREQS WHEN CONDUCTING PRACTICE APCHS, AND THAT PLTS BE PREPARED TO SWITCH TO TWR FREQ IN ANY CASE WHEN REACHING THE FAF. I WOULD ALSO COMMENT THAT CFII AS OPPOSED TO QUALIFIED SAFETY PLTS WHO ARE NOT CFII'S ARE BETTER ABLE TO CATCH A MISSED HDOF WHILE A PLT IS PRACTICING AN APCH.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.