37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 160706 |
Time | |
Date | 199010 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : sea |
State Reference | WA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 1400 msl bound upper : 1400 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : sea |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 6 flight time total : 300 flight time type : 200 |
ASRS Report | 160706 |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : far other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
After completing 2 hours of an IMC flight on an IFR flight plan at olm and tiw, to keep up on my IFR currency, I cancelled the IFR flight plan at tiw and proceeded VFR to S50, 15 NM north and e--about a 6 min flight. Staying below the sea TCA where the base begins at 1600', I flew at 1400', and using familiar landmarks to keep myself south of the 5 NM boundary where the airspace began at the surface. When I got home I was looking at the sea TCA chart and found that the latest revision to the chart had extended the south boundary from 5 NM to 6 NM. Using my old familiar landmarks to keep me out of the TCA, now had me enter the TCA for a 2 mi stretch flying w-e, at about 5.5 NM (no DME in aircraft). I was flying a very short flight in an area I thought I was very familiar with, using landmarks I've used for over 4 yrs, so I did not use the sea TCA chart. I always try to find all the new changes as each new chart comes out, but I had missed the change from 5 NM to 6 NM. I had not approached the airport from this direction since the new chart came out. One idea is to always have the TCA chart out, even on such a short flight, in familiar areas. Another is that the new changes on a chart be highlighted somehow, or underlined, or a paragraph be written explaining the new changes in the chart.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: SMA PENETRATES EDGE OF TCA.
Narrative: AFTER COMPLETING 2 HRS OF AN IMC FLT ON AN IFR FLT PLAN AT OLM AND TIW, TO KEEP UP ON MY IFR CURRENCY, I CANCELLED THE IFR FLT PLAN AT TIW AND PROCEEDED VFR TO S50, 15 NM N AND E--ABOUT A 6 MIN FLT. STAYING BELOW THE SEA TCA WHERE THE BASE BEGINS AT 1600', I FLEW AT 1400', AND USING FAMILIAR LANDMARKS TO KEEP MYSELF S OF THE 5 NM BOUNDARY WHERE THE AIRSPACE BEGAN AT THE SURFACE. WHEN I GOT HOME I WAS LOOKING AT THE SEA TCA CHART AND FOUND THAT THE LATEST REVISION TO THE CHART HAD EXTENDED THE S BOUNDARY FROM 5 NM TO 6 NM. USING MY OLD FAMILIAR LANDMARKS TO KEEP ME OUT OF THE TCA, NOW HAD ME ENTER THE TCA FOR A 2 MI STRETCH FLYING W-E, AT ABOUT 5.5 NM (NO DME IN ACFT). I WAS FLYING A VERY SHORT FLT IN AN AREA I THOUGHT I WAS VERY FAMILIAR WITH, USING LANDMARKS I'VE USED FOR OVER 4 YRS, SO I DID NOT USE THE SEA TCA CHART. I ALWAYS TRY TO FIND ALL THE NEW CHANGES AS EACH NEW CHART COMES OUT, BUT I HAD MISSED THE CHANGE FROM 5 NM TO 6 NM. I HAD NOT APCHED THE ARPT FROM THIS DIRECTION SINCE THE NEW CHART CAME OUT. ONE IDEA IS TO ALWAYS HAVE THE TCA CHART OUT, EVEN ON SUCH A SHORT FLT, IN FAMILIAR AREAS. ANOTHER IS THAT THE NEW CHANGES ON A CHART BE HIGHLIGHTED SOMEHOW, OR UNDERLINED, OR A PARAGRAPH BE WRITTEN EXPLAINING THE NEW CHANGES IN THE CHART.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.