37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1615950 |
Time | |
Date | 201902 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B767-300 and 300 ER |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | A321 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Taxi |
Route In Use | None |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Local Instructor |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Experience | Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 13 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Local |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Developmental |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Ground Conflict Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Clearance Ground Incursion Runway |
Narrative:
Crash and rescue was called for a cat 2 for the emergency aircraft X because of a flap issue; and deployed multiple vehicles in places around runway 30L. Aircraft X landed without incident; turned off and cleared the runway downfield at taxiway M. The next arrival to runway 30L was 7 miles away; so aircraft Y was put into position on runway 30L awaiting aircraft X clearing downfield. After aircraft X cleared the runway; he asked if crash rescue could inspect the aircraft outside; and vehicles that were close to aircraft X approached the aircraft. There were some additional crash vehicles on the opposite side of the runway that; after aircraft X cleared the runway and had asked for the inspection; started to position themselves to cross close to aircraft X at taxiway M.the crash vehicles asked for a crossing at taxiway M to join the inspection of other vehicles on the other side; and priority was given for them to cross with aircraft Y still holding in position. The multiple vehicles crossed at taxiway M; however; it was not clear if all vehicles were clear of the runway when the aircraft on final; aircraft Z; was at a 2 mile final. The decision was made to exit aircraft Y because of not getting an 'all clear' from the rescue vehicles and not visually able to tell if they were all off the runway. Aircraft Y tried to exit at A2; but was slow getting off; while at the same time crash vehicles called clear at taxiway M. Aircraft Y appeared to be clear at A2; but the asde (airport surface detection equipment) alerted; and aircraft Z was sent around.the multiple vehicle crossing at M; delayed calling clear; and aircraft slow to exit all contributed to aircraft Z going around. While there was a go around; safety was not compromised; and priority was given correctly to the emergency aircraft and vehicles. The timing of all parties involved was just a little slow; but does not demonstrate a pattern or need for any changes.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Tower Controllers reported sending an aircraft around due to Airport Surface Detection Equipment alert for an aircraft exiting the runway.
Narrative: Crash and Rescue was called for a Cat 2 for the emergency Aircraft X because of a flap issue; and deployed multiple vehicles in places around Runway 30L. Aircraft X landed without incident; turned off and cleared the runway downfield at taxiway M. The next arrival to Runway 30L was 7 miles away; so Aircraft Y was put into position on Runway 30L awaiting Aircraft X clearing downfield. After Aircraft X cleared the runway; he asked if Crash Rescue could inspect the aircraft outside; and vehicles that were close to Aircraft X approached the aircraft. There were some additional Crash vehicles on the opposite side of the runway that; after Aircraft X cleared the runway and had asked for the inspection; started to position themselves to cross close to Aircraft X at taxiway M.The Crash vehicles asked for a crossing at taxiway M to join the inspection of other vehicles on the other side; and priority was given for them to cross with Aircraft Y still holding in position. The multiple vehicles crossed at taxiway M; however; it was not clear if all vehicles were clear of the runway when the aircraft on final; Aircraft Z; was at a 2 mile final. The decision was made to exit Aircraft Y because of not getting an 'All clear' from the rescue vehicles and not visually able to tell if they were all off the runway. Aircraft Y tried to exit at A2; but was slow getting off; while at the same time Crash vehicles called clear at taxiway M. Aircraft Y appeared to be clear at A2; but the ASDE (Airport Surface Detection Equipment) alerted; and Aircraft Z was sent around.The multiple vehicle crossing at M; delayed calling clear; and aircraft slow to exit all contributed to Aircraft Z going around. While there was a go around; safety was not compromised; and priority was given correctly to the emergency aircraft and vehicles. The timing of all parties involved was just a little slow; but does not demonstrate a pattern or need for any changes.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.