37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1624814 |
Time | |
Date | 201903 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ATL.Airport |
State Reference | GA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737-700 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Route In Use | STAR HOBTT TWO |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | B747 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 391 Flight Crew Type 6000 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 292 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Clearance Inflight Event / Encounter Wake Vortex Encounter |
Narrative:
On the hobtt arrival into atl; we encountered wake turbulence from [a] B747 twice. Subsequently; the first atl approach controller slowed us down to 210 knots due to the B747 in front of us. I slowed down; and shallowed out the descent rate to avoid any more encounters. On downwind; we were experiencing quartering tailwinds. Abeam the airport; the next controller's supervisor or monitor position broke into approach's transmissions and told us that our descent rate was unacceptable and warned that if we didn't get down that we would have to do a 25-mile final. She seemed very upset. I felt; at that point; we would not get into the wake upset anymore since [the other] aircraft got cleared a few minutes prior. I then increased the descent rate. I am very familiar with the downwind descent rates needed in atl. The captain and I have both experienced wake turbulence in the past. I felt it was safe to do a shallow descent to avoid further encounter. Even the prior controller cautioned us of the B747 in front of us. I felt that the monitor/supervisor that got upset with us should have communicated this to us. It's great for ATC to get numerous aircraft into a large terminal facility very quickly. But more importantly it is better to avoid a wake turbulence encounter.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737-700 flight crew reported encountering wake turbulence from a preceding B747 on arrival into ATL.
Narrative: On the HOBTT Arrival into ATL; we encountered wake turbulence from [a] B747 twice. Subsequently; the first ATL Approach Controller slowed us down to 210 knots due to the B747 in front of us. I slowed down; and shallowed out the descent rate to avoid any more encounters. On downwind; we were experiencing quartering tailwinds. Abeam the airport; the next controller's Supervisor or Monitor position broke into Approach's transmissions and told us that our descent rate was unacceptable and warned that if we didn't get down that we would have to do a 25-mile final. She seemed very upset. I felt; at that point; we would not get into the wake upset anymore since [the other] aircraft got cleared a few minutes prior. I then increased the descent rate. I am very familiar with the downwind descent rates needed in ATL. The Captain and I have both experienced wake turbulence in the past. I felt it was safe to do a shallow descent to avoid further encounter. Even the prior Controller cautioned us of the B747 in front of us. I felt that the Monitor/Supervisor that got upset with us should have communicated this to us. It's great for ATC to get numerous aircraft into a large terminal facility very quickly. But more importantly it is better to avoid a wake turbulence encounter.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.