C152 student pilot reported a near midair collision with a light twin during climbout from a touch a...

Narrative:

I am a student pilot and was doing touch and go practice. I had done my first touch and go of the day. I made my crosswind turn roughly .5 NM past the threshold of runway 11 at 700 feet. I continued a climb to 1;000 to 1;100 feet and made my turn downwind. Seconds into the downwind turn a twin-engine cessna cut up and across the nose of my plane with an estimated miss distance of 10 to 20 feet. I flew through the wake turbulence/prop wash of the twin-engine seconds later when I entered the air where the twin-engine had been. The twin-engine continued its ascent up and out of the airspace. After the near midair collision no calls came from the tower; the twin-engine; nor myself. I was given clearance for my next touch and go shortly after. No corrective action was taken by myself due to the lack of time to react to the near midair collision. I was not informed of the traffic or any actions to take nor do I remember the twin-engine having been given information on my location. I believe that this contributed to the incident and if information of this type had been given alongside preventative actions; such as an extended upwind for either aircraft involved; this incident could have been avoided. I believe it was unrealistic for ATC to assume both aircraft would spot each other with no advisory given the short timeline of events and close proximity.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: C152 student pilot reported a NMAC with a light twin during climbout from a touch and go.

Narrative: I am a student pilot and was doing touch and go practice. I had done my first touch and go of the day. I made my crosswind turn roughly .5 NM past the threshold of Runway 11 at 700 feet. I continued a climb to 1;000 to 1;100 feet and made my turn downwind. Seconds into the downwind turn a twin-engine Cessna cut up and across the nose of my plane with an estimated miss distance of 10 to 20 feet. I flew through the wake turbulence/prop wash of the twin-engine seconds later when I entered the air where the twin-engine had been. The twin-engine continued its ascent up and out of the airspace. After the near midair collision no calls came from the Tower; the twin-engine; nor myself. I was given clearance for my next touch and go shortly after. No corrective action was taken by myself due to the lack of time to react to the NMAC. I was not informed of the traffic or any actions to take nor do I remember the twin-engine having been given information on my location. I believe that this contributed to the incident and if information of this type had been given alongside preventative actions; such as an extended upwind for either aircraft involved; this incident could have been avoided. I believe it was unrealistic for ATC to assume both aircraft would spot each other with no advisory given the short timeline of events and close proximity.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

Attributes
ACN	1638898
Time
Date	201904
Local Time Of Day	1801-2400
Place
Locale Reference	SBP.Airport
State Reference	CA
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Make Model Name	Cessna 152
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	Initial Climb
Route In Use	Other VFR Pattern
Flight Plan	VFR
Aircraft 2
Make Model Name	Cessna Twin Piston Undifferentiated or Other Model
Person 1
Function	Pilot Flying Single Pilot
Qualification	Flight Crew Student
Experience	Flight Crew Last 90 Days 26 Flight Crew Total 26 Flight Crew Type 20
Events
Anomaly	ATC Issue All Types Conflict NMAC
Miss Distance	Horizontal 15 Vertical 0

C152 student pilot reported a near midair collision with a light twin during climbout from a touch and go.