![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1649257 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201905 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | VNY.Airport |
| State Reference | CA |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Small Aircraft Low Wing 2 Eng Retractable Gear |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
| Route In Use | SID Canog2.fim |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 12 Flight Crew Total 3300 Flight Crew Type 2500 |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | Instructor Pilot Not Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Multiengine |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT |
Narrative:
The flight was a routine training flight from vny. The clearance was the CANOG2 dp with the fim transition; altitude assignment 4;000 feet the departure was normal we were handed over to socal approach. Note this SID has an altitude restriction of 2.2 DME from the vny VOR at or below 1;700 feet. After meeting the climb restriction; the climb to 4;000 feet commenced. On a heading of 213 as required on the SID points directly toward a mountain range of around 3;500 feet with a 4;000 feet ATC altitude assignment. Because of the dp restriction requires an aircraft configuration change to climb to the 4;000 feet which resulted in a slower rate of climb to the assigned altitude. Conditions were VMC I could clearly see the mountain range. Additionally I used terrain avoidance tools such as twas and my mfd and a cross radial all for situational awareness. The 'fence' is a cross radial from a VOR (lax 316 radial) perpendicular to the flight path. This will help insure situational awareness on the departure and in the case of radio failure. As I reached my 'fence' I contacted socal approach questioning my upcoming turn as reminder to the controller and to confirm continued communication. The controller replied 'continue.' as I got closer to the mountains; I could see that I would clear the top possible by only 500 feet. I then requested a turn for terrain avoidance. The controller gave me the turn and vectored me on course. Almost immediately I received a low altitude alert 2x. My reply was I have visual contact with the terrain and expressed my dissatisfaction with the late vector. In my opinion this could be an item of safety had it been IMC or a possible an inexperienced instrument pilot. The takeaways from the flight are: the importance of pilot/controller communication and always maintain situation awareness. Use the terrain mode; taws/GPS and navigation cross radials. Additionally always brief high terrain before departure with the caption special conditions. Last but not least never be afraid to speak up whenever there is a question or doubt. If climb performance becomes an issue advise the controller.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Light Twin flight crew reported ATC slow to issue climb clearance resulting in two avoidable 'low altitude alerts.'
Narrative: The flight was a routine training flight from VNY. The clearance was the CANOG2 DP with the FIM transition; Altitude assignment 4;000 feet the departure was normal we were handed over to SoCal Approach. Note this SID has an altitude restriction of 2.2 DME from the VNY VOR at or below 1;700 feet. After meeting the climb restriction; the climb to 4;000 feet commenced. On a heading of 213 as required on the SID points directly toward a mountain range of around 3;500 feet with a 4;000 feet ATC altitude assignment. Because of the DP restriction requires an aircraft configuration change to climb to the 4;000 feet which resulted in a slower rate of climb to the assigned altitude. Conditions were VMC I could clearly see the mountain range. Additionally I used terrain avoidance tools such as TWAS and my MFD and a cross radial all for situational awareness. The 'fence' is a cross radial from a VOR (LAX 316 radial) perpendicular to the flight path. This will help insure situational awareness on the departure and in the case of radio failure. As I reached my 'fence' I contacted SoCal Approach questioning my upcoming turn as reminder to the Controller and to confirm continued communication. The Controller replied 'continue.' As I got closer to the mountains; I could see that I would clear the top possible by only 500 feet. I then requested a turn for terrain avoidance. The Controller gave me the turn and vectored me on course. Almost immediately I received a low altitude alert 2x. My reply was I have visual contact with the terrain and expressed my dissatisfaction with the late vector. In my opinion this could be an item of safety had it been IMC or a possible an inexperienced instrument pilot. The takeaways from the flight are: The importance of pilot/controller communication and always maintain situation awareness. Use the terrain mode; TAWS/GPS and NAV cross radials. Additionally always brief high terrain before departure with the caption SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Last but not least never be afraid to speak up whenever there is a question or doubt. If climb performance becomes an issue advise the Controller.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.