37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 166188 |
Time | |
Date | 199012 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : yyz |
State Reference | ON |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 2000 msl bound upper : 2000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : yyz |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | Small Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing other |
Route In Use | enroute : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 13500 flight time type : 1750 |
ASRS Report | 166188 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : weather non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance other |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
This problem arose when a crew was rushed into an instrument approach west/O sufficient time to prepare. While plting an small transport aircraft into ykz we were forced to make 2 missed approachs there due to WX. On the second go around, we decided to go to buffalo and wait it out. We then thought to ask toronto if they would let us land at ykz even though we had no landing reservation. He said yes and began vectoring us around to runway 6L. We now found ourselves only mins away from an ILS approach and the airplane was still in the takeoff confign. During this short time of maneuvering around, finding approach plates, calculating approach speeds, completing checklists and working controllers, we managed to set up runway 6R rather than runway 6L. We went through the runway 6L localizer and conflicted with runway 6R. My point is to be aware of all facets of the approach system and know how much of it you can handle. I've been doing approachs for many yrs and suddenly I'm landing on the wrong runway. X-chk all your data and confirm any doubt with the controller. If things don't begin right they won't end right.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: DIVERTED TO ARPT WITHIN 10 MILES RESULTING IN LIMITED TIME TO PREPARE FOR APCH.
Narrative: THIS PROB AROSE WHEN A CREW WAS RUSHED INTO AN INSTRUMENT APCH W/O SUFFICIENT TIME TO PREPARE. WHILE PLTING AN SMT ACFT INTO YKZ WE WERE FORCED TO MAKE 2 MISSED APCHS THERE DUE TO WX. ON THE SEC GO AROUND, WE DECIDED TO GO TO BUFFALO AND WAIT IT OUT. WE THEN THOUGHT TO ASK TORONTO IF THEY WOULD LET US LAND AT YKZ EVEN THOUGH WE HAD NO LNDG RESERVATION. HE SAID YES AND BEGAN VECTORING US AROUND TO RWY 6L. WE NOW FOUND OURSELVES ONLY MINS AWAY FROM AN ILS APCH AND THE AIRPLANE WAS STILL IN THE TKOF CONFIGN. DURING THIS SHORT TIME OF MANEUVERING AROUND, FINDING APCH PLATES, CALCULATING APCH SPDS, COMPLETING CHKLISTS AND WORKING CTLRS, WE MANAGED TO SET UP RWY 6R RATHER THAN RWY 6L. WE WENT THROUGH THE RWY 6L LOC AND CONFLICTED WITH RWY 6R. MY POINT IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL FACETS OF THE APCH SYS AND KNOW HOW MUCH OF IT YOU CAN HANDLE. I'VE BEEN DOING APCHS FOR MANY YRS AND SUDDENLY I'M LNDG ON THE WRONG RWY. X-CHK ALL YOUR DATA AND CONFIRM ANY DOUBT WITH THE CTLR. IF THINGS DON'T BEGIN R THEY WON'T END R.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.