37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1663541 |
Time | |
Date | 201907 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZJX.ARTCC |
State Reference | FL |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Citationjet (C525/C526) - CJ I / II / III / IV |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Route In Use | Direct |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Enroute |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Experience | Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 10 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict NMAC Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence |
Narrative:
I was the radar controller working combined sectors. Aircraft X was climbing out westbound; and contacted us for further climb. I am not 100% sure if I issued a climb on initial contact to 26;000 feet. Or not. It is possible that it fell through the cracks; as I was busy at the time. Aircraft X called to ask if there was traffic at their 12'oclock; at which time I noticed a data tag in the adjacent TRACON's airspace at 23;000 feet.; the same altitude as aircraft X. Without coordination; I instructed aircraft X to immediately turn to a 180 heading and expedite a climb to 26;000 feet. There was absolutely a loss (of separation) and probably a near midair collision. My d-side (assist) called the TRACON to advise them that we had turned aircraft X. I am not sure with whom the fault lies; as I cannot be 100% sure that I issued a climb on initial contact; and I am not sure how long aircraft X was level at 23;000 feet. The loss occurred in TRACON airspace. This partially stems from the sector being overloaded with weather and traffic; and partially from controller error (assuming the climb was not issued). I feel that more attention needs to be given to sectors that are experiencing high volume and weather; and better staffing procedures should be implemented. It is a known issue that the tsd (traffic situation display) numbers do not function correctly at this sector; and thus it does not receive the management and traffic M(management) unit support that it often deserves.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ZJX Center Controller reported they may have caused a loss of separation and an NMAC in the adjacent TRACON airspace.
Narrative: I was the Radar Controller working combined sectors. Aircraft X was climbing out westbound; and contacted us for further climb. I am not 100% sure if I issued a climb on initial contact to 26;000 feet. or not. It is possible that it fell through the cracks; as I was busy at the time. Aircraft X called to ask if there was traffic at their 12'oclock; at which time I noticed a data tag in the adjacent TRACON's airspace at 23;000 feet.; the same altitude as Aircraft X. Without coordination; I instructed Aircraft X to immediately turn to a 180 heading and expedite a climb to 26;000 feet. There was absolutely a Loss (of Separation) and probably a NMAC. My d-side (Assist) called the TRACON to advise them that we had turned Aircraft X. I am not sure with whom the fault lies; as I cannot be 100% sure that I issued a climb on initial contact; and I am not sure how long Aircraft X was level at 23;000 feet. The LOSS occurred in TRACON airspace. This partially stems from the sector being overloaded with weather and traffic; and partially from controller error (assuming the climb was not issued). I feel that more attention needs to be given to sectors that are experiencing high volume and weather; and better staffing procedures should be implemented. It is a known issue that the TSD (Traffic Situation Display) numbers do not function correctly at this sector; and thus it does not receive the management and Traffic M(Management) Unit support that it often deserves.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.