37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1676332 |
Time | |
Date | 201908 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ATL.Airport |
State Reference | GA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737-700 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 463 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying First Officer |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 488 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence |
Narrative:
On approach into atl runway 10; on about a three-mile final; we received a wind shear caution. I hesitated on the go-around because our go-around would have taken us directly into a thunderstorm; traffic on the northern runways barred a turn across the airport; we were not experiencing any indications of wind shear and the aircraft in 2.5 miles in front of us only experienced minor fluctuations in airspeed. We both knew we were supposed to initiate a normal go-around; but I thought the placement of the weather looked like bigger threat and I did not want to fly into it. We continued the approach; turned off the automation and prepared to initiate a wind shear recovery maneuver. We encountered only minor airspeed variations. By procedure we should have initiated a go around; I thought the weather's placement was a bigger threat; so I made the decision to continue.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737 flight crew reported continuing to land with wind shear warning to avoid weather and airborne conflict on go around.
Narrative: On approach into ATL Runway 10; on about a three-mile final; we received a wind shear caution. I hesitated on the go-around because our go-around would have taken us directly into a thunderstorm; traffic on the northern runways barred a turn across the airport; we were not experiencing any indications of wind shear and the aircraft in 2.5 miles in front of us only experienced minor fluctuations in airspeed. We both knew we were supposed to initiate a normal go-around; but I thought the placement of the weather looked like bigger threat and I did not want to fly into it. We continued the approach; turned off the automation and prepared to initiate a wind shear recovery maneuver. We encountered only minor airspeed variations. By procedure we should have initiated a go around; I thought the weather's placement was a bigger threat; so I made the decision to continue.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.