 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Air carrier captain reported confusion when air traffic control issued instructions to follow 'standard taxi routes' that were not published.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1678077 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201908 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ORD.Airport |
| State Reference | IL |
| Environment | |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Large Transport |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Taxi |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 205 Flight Crew Total 1389 Flight Crew Type 1115 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
We landed on 9L at ord with no issues. On clearing the runway; ground control asked if we were familiar with the 'standard taxi routes.' since there were no taxi routes described in any [chart] pages; nor in any ATC notams; we responded 'no;' and were give taxi instructions that were simply 'follow the aircraft in from of you; hold short of T-7.'this was not a simple taxi route; due to the ongoing ord construction. As we taxied; even the aircraft in front of us admitted they had no guidance as to what 'standard taxi routes' were in ord. I followed his route; based on my last time I was there; and we all ended up in the right spot. The aircraft behind us also admitted that they had absolutely no written guidance on 'standard taxi routes' at ord.my issue is that ord ATC controllers insist there is a 'standard taxi route' from runway 9L/27R; yet there is absolutely nothing published in the [chart] pages. There was a time a few months ago that standard taxi routes were issued by NOTAM; but that currently isn't the case. With no further direction than 'follow the aircraft in front of you' in an area where I was not always able to keep them in sight; it was a real possibility that I could have ended up in the wrong area of the airport.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Air carrier Captain reported confusion when Air Traffic Control issued instructions to follow 'standard taxi routes' that were not published.
Narrative: We landed on 9L at ORD with no issues. On clearing the runway; Ground Control asked if we were familiar with the 'Standard Taxi Routes.' Since there were no taxi routes described in any [chart] pages; nor in any ATC NOTAMs; we responded 'No;' and were give taxi instructions that were simply 'Follow the aircraft in from of you; Hold Short of T-7.'This was not a simple taxi route; due to the ongoing ORD construction. As we taxied; even the aircraft in front of us admitted they had no guidance as to what 'Standard Taxi Routes' were in ORD. I followed his route; based on my last time I was there; and we all ended up in the right spot. The aircraft behind us also admitted that they had absolutely no written guidance on 'Standard Taxi Routes' at ORD.My issue is that ORD ATC Controllers insist there is a 'Standard Taxi Route' from Runway 9L/27R; yet there is absolutely nothing published in the [chart] pages. There was a time a few months ago that Standard Taxi Routes were issued by NOTAM; but that currently isn't the case. With no further direction than 'Follow the aircraft in front of you' in an area where I was not always able to keep them in sight; it was a real possibility that I could have ended up in the wrong area of the airport.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.