37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1683273 |
Time | |
Date | 201909 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | S46.TRACON |
State Reference | WA |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Approach Departure |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Experience | Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 11.0 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Airspace Violation All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Aircraft X was executing a go around due to a possible bird strike on the preceding arrival. I turned aircraft X back into a downwind; and manually coordinated with final that he was level at 3000 feet due to aircraft Y crossing the airport westbound at 4000 feet. Finals would need to climb aircraft X when he was clear of traffic to ensure separation with the bfi final at 2200 feet. I called the traffic to aircraft X and turned him northbound into the downwind. I coordinated a point out off of the landline to the bfi arrival controller on aircraft X. At the same time I was doing the manual point out; I saw aircraft Y appeared to be in a descent. I turned aircraft X to a 250 heading; asked him to expedite; and displayed his data block on the satellite controller's scope. I called satellite and asked them to turn their traffic northbound.the complexity around seatac and boeing creates a number of problems. Aircraft Y had been displayed but not pointed out to the arrival D controller. It is not clear if they had been pointed out to finals; and satellite had assumed the aircraft had been pointed out; giving him control for descent. I don't have a specific airspace recommendation. The satellite controller had told me later he thought aircraft X was a departure; not a go around; and would be climbing above his traffic.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: S46 TRACON Controller reported a loss of separation due to confusing coordination and complex airspace between adjacent airports.
Narrative: Aircraft X was executing a go around due to a possible bird strike on the preceding arrival. I turned Aircraft X back into a downwind; and manually coordinated with final that he was level at 3000 feet due to Aircraft Y crossing the airport westbound at 4000 feet. Finals would need to climb Aircraft X when he was clear of traffic to ensure separation with the BFI final at 2200 feet. I called the traffic to Aircraft X and turned him northbound into the downwind. I coordinated a point out off of the landline to the BFI arrival controller on Aircraft X. At the same time I was doing the manual point out; I saw Aircraft Y appeared to be in a descent. I turned Aircraft X to a 250 heading; asked him to expedite; and displayed his data block on the satellite controller's scope. I called satellite and asked them to turn their traffic northbound.The complexity around SEATAC and Boeing creates a number of problems. Aircraft Y had been displayed but not pointed out to the Arrival D controller. It is not clear if they had been pointed out to finals; and satellite had assumed the aircraft had been pointed out; giving him control for descent. I don't have a specific airspace recommendation. The satellite controller had told me later he thought Aircraft X was a departure; not a go around; and would be climbing above his traffic.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.