B767 flight crew reported a rejected takeoff after multiple EICAS messages and systems failures.

Attributes
ACN	1688423
Time
Date	201909
Local Time Of Day	1801-2400
Place
Locale Reference	ZZZZ.Airport
State Reference	FO
Environment
Flight Conditions	IMC
Light	Dusk
Aircraft 1
Make Model Name	B767 Undifferentiated or Other Model
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 121
Flight Phase	Takeoff
Flight Plan	IFR
Component
Aircraft Component	System Monitor: Indicating and Warning
Person 1
Function	Captain Pilot Flying
Qualification	Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP)
Experience	Flight Crew Last 90 Days 200 Flight Crew Total 3259 Flight Crew Type 3259
Person 2
Function	First Officer Pilot Not Flying
Qualification	Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument
Experience	Flight Crew Last 90 Days 175 Flight Crew Total 7272 Flight Crew Type 3411
Events
Anomaly	Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical

Narrative:

During takeoff roll; multiple EICAS cautions illuminated (autothrottle disc / autobrakes). There was an additional sub-EICAS caution; however we do not recall what the 3rd EICAS caution was. (Probably FMC but not sure) I made the decision to reject the takeoff below 100 kts.; while analyzing all the EICAS cautions and recognizing all takeoff data on FMC takeoff page had dumped. Initiated [rejected takeoff] at approximately 100 kts.; first officer (first officer) saw approximately 115 kts. As our peak acceleration speed.first officer advised ZZZ ATC of our rejected takeoff; we cleared the runway via high-speed and advised we did not need emergency services. Proceeded to hardstand 256; monitored the brake temps and completed the rejected takeoff checklist; advising operations of our issues. Right brakes reached peak temps of 3x6 on brakes and 1x7 momentarily; all cooled below 3 within 20 minutes. Left brakes were 3x4; 1x5 peak temps all cooled below 3 within 15 minutes. Ground personnel were advised to remain clear as we monitored the temps and cooling chart.maintenance found faults with thrust management computer that resulted in lost comm with all 3 IRU's; both FMC's and both eec's and indicated that was probably the reason for all the EICAS cautions. Systems reset; faults cleared and systems tested; continued to ZZZ1 with a 1+30 delay.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B767 flight crew reported a rejected takeoff after multiple EICAS messages and systems failures.

Narrative: During Takeoff Roll; multiple EICAS Cautions illuminated (AUTOTHROTTLE DISC / AUTOBRAKES). There was an additional sub-EICAS Caution; however we do not recall what the 3rd EICAS Caution was. (Probably FMC but not sure) I made the decision to reject the takeoff below 100 kts.; while analyzing all the EICAS Cautions and recognizing all takeoff data on FMC takeoff page had dumped. Initiated [Rejected Takeoff] at approximately 100 kts.; FO (First Officer) saw approximately 115 kts. as our peak acceleration speed.FO advised ZZZ ATC of our rejected takeoff; we cleared the runway via high-speed and advised we did not need emergency services. Proceeded to hardstand 256; monitored the brake temps and completed the rejected takeoff checklist; advising operations of our issues. Right brakes reached peak temps of 3x6 on brakes and 1x7 momentarily; all cooled below 3 within 20 minutes. Left brakes were 3x4; 1x5 peak temps all cooled below 3 within 15 minutes. Ground personnel were advised to remain clear as we monitored the temps and cooling chart.Maintenance found faults with Thrust Management Computer that resulted in lost comm with all 3 IRU's; both FMC's and both EEC's and indicated that was probably the reason for all the EICAS cautions. Systems reset; faults cleared and systems tested; continued to ZZZ1 with a 1+30 delay.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.