37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1692466 |
Time | |
Date | 201910 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | A319 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 193 Flight Crew Total 3421 Flight Crew Type 2877 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 221 Flight Crew Total 6330 Flight Crew Type 3528 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Downloaded paperwork for flight. Flight was routine till approach and descent into ZZZ. Enroute; I reviewed the mountain flying guide and 10-7 pages for approach to runway xx. A note in the flight plan - dispatcher remarks - was also reviewed: runway xy not authorized for airbus aircraft at night. We planned and briefed night visual backed up by the ILS runway xx with a long straight in final. Talking to approach; descending through 13;700; [approach] asked if we had airport in sight. We did and they cleared us for the visual to runway xx. Abeam/over [the] airport; [we were] told to contact tower. Tower offered a right downwind to runway xy [but] we declined because of the note from dispatch stating [that] landing on xy [was] not authorized at night. We had good visibility and could see the outlines of the mountains from the full moon through the thin overcast. Captain continued to fly up the valley and proceeded to do a left 180 degree turn at approximately 10 DME from airport with ground contact and visual reference to the airport. I monitored the pfd (primary flight display) and terrain clearances during the turn and we were above all terrain; green on pfd during the course reversal. We configured early and proceeded with an uneventful landing.once on ground we debriefed the arrival and both agreed that we should have taken vectors to final or just requested the ILS to runway xx. We both assumed that approach would have provided assistance; vectors to final; per the 10-7 pages. I know we have the final say and should have just done a go around toward the airport and contacted approach for a vectored ILS approach.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A319 flight crew reported confusing airport charts and lack of ATC assistance on approach.
Narrative: Downloaded paperwork for flight. Flight was routine till approach and descent into ZZZ. Enroute; I reviewed the mountain flying guide and 10-7 pages for approach to Runway XX. A note in the flight plan - Dispatcher remarks - was also reviewed: Runway XY not authorized for Airbus aircraft at night. We planned and briefed night visual backed up by the ILS Runway XX with a long straight in final. Talking to Approach; descending through 13;700; [Approach] asked if we had airport in sight. We did and they cleared us for the visual to Runway XX. Abeam/over [the] airport; [we were] told to contact Tower. Tower offered a right downwind to Runway XY [but] we declined because of the note from Dispatch stating [that] landing on XY [was] not authorized at night. We had good visibility and could see the outlines of the mountains from the full moon through the thin overcast. Captain continued to fly up the valley and proceeded to do a left 180 degree turn at approximately 10 DME from airport with ground contact and visual reference to the airport. I monitored the PFD (Primary Flight Display) and terrain clearances during the turn and we were above all terrain; green on PFD during the course reversal. We configured early and proceeded with an uneventful landing.Once on ground we debriefed the arrival and both agreed that we should have taken vectors to final or just requested the ILS to Runway XX. We both assumed that Approach would have provided assistance; vectors to final; per the 10-7 pages. I know we have the final say and should have just done a go around toward the airport and contacted Approach for a vectored ILS approach.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.