37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1692681 |
Time | |
Date | 201910 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | CAK.Airport |
State Reference | OH |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Route In Use | Direct |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Single Pilot |
Qualification | Flight Crew Private |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 21 Flight Crew Total 370 Flight Crew Type 306 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict |
Narrative:
While on a direct VFR flight from ZZZ to cak I had a near miss with aircraft Y approximately 14 miles west of cak. I had established contact with cle approach; 20 miles out and received confirmation of radar contact and received a squawk code. At approximately 14 miles out (from the class C airspace) I sighted the other aircraft approaching from the southeast at near my altitude. It was less than 1/4 mile when I spotted it and immediately reduced power and began a fast descent to gain separation. I saw no reaction from the other aircraft. After I made initial contact with cle approach a squawk code was given to an aircraft flying from ZZZ1 to 3g3. I suspect this was that aircraft. I understand some transition will happen with the TRACON moving to cle but in the [X] years I have operated out of cak I have never have had traffic within the visual range that I haven't been warned about while in radar contact. It was a busy time on the radio but this should not have been missed. On a second note not related to this event but in the same control space. My partner in the same plane was contacting cle approach to enter the class C space at cak and was given a squawk code with the #8 in it. After telling ATC unable due to the #8 ATC then gave a second code with the #9 in it. After the second unable to comply the third code was finally compatible with the system.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Pilot reported an airborne conflict while on approach to CAK without being notified by ATC.
Narrative: While on a direct VFR flight from ZZZ to CAK I had a near miss with Aircraft Y approximately 14 miles west of CAK. I had established contact with CLE Approach; 20 miles out and received confirmation of radar contact and received a squawk code. At approximately 14 miles out (from the class C airspace) I sighted the other aircraft approaching from the southeast at near my altitude. It was less than 1/4 mile when I spotted it and immediately reduced power and began a fast descent to gain separation. I saw no reaction from the other aircraft. After I made initial contact with CLE Approach a squawk code was given to an aircraft flying from ZZZ1 to 3G3. I suspect this was that aircraft. I understand some transition will happen with the TRACON moving to CLE but in the [X] years I have operated out of CAK I have never have had traffic within the visual range that I haven't been warned about while in radar contact. It was a busy time on the radio but this should not have been missed. On a second note not related to this event but in the same control space. My partner in the same plane was contacting CLE Approach to enter the Class C space at CAK and was given a squawk code with the #8 in it. After telling ATC unable due to the #8 ATC then gave a second code with the #9 in it. After the second unable to comply the third code was finally compatible with the system.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.