37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1710354 |
Time | |
Date | 201912 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737-400 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Parked |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Toilet Furnishing |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Maintenance Deviation - Procedural MEL Deviation - Procedural FAR Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Pilot in command conducted four flights in aircraft X. There was an non-essential equipment furnishing in the aircraft maintenance logbook listed as 25-XXXX; forward lav flight attendant call button inopperative; dated [date]. However; as I discovered after the flights were completed; this MEL was not the correct one for the aircraft condition. I was again assigned to aircraft X in ZZZ and I was conducting my preflight inspection. I was reviewing mels and maintenance records and it suddenly struck me that the attendant call button might not be possible to defer. I reviewed the minimum equipment list and noted that MEL 25-XXX applied to 'cabin reading lights; light lens covers; and lav occupied lights may be inoperative provided enough light is available for safe working conditions during night operation.' consequently the MEL did not apply to the flight attendant call button in the forward lav. A review of the records indicated that aircraft X had conducted numerous flights since the MEL 25-XXXX had been applied to the aircraft.I checked the expiration date of the non-essential equipment furnishing; noted that it was still within limits before expiration; and I didn't investigate farther. Consequently I conducted the flights listed above.I contacted local maintenance personnel and maintenance control and informed them of the situation; stating that I would not be able to fly the airplane until the issue was corrected and I could legally fly the airplane. Subsequently; the forward lav was locked out and deferred in accordance with MEL xx-xx; paperwork was completed and I subsequently conducted all the following scheduled flights for the day; although the flight was delayed due to the maintenance issue. This has been a recurring issue with incorrect MEL/nef guidance from maintenance control which result in aircraft flying when they are legally required to be repaired; grounded; or a more a more restrictive action is due to be applied.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737 Captain reported that an aircraft flew several times with an incorrectly applied MEL.
Narrative: Pilot in Command conducted four flights in Aircraft X. There was an Non-essential Equipment Furnishing in the aircraft maintenance logbook listed as 25-XXXX; Forward Lav flight attendant call button inopperative; dated [date]. However; as I discovered after the flights were completed; this MEL was not the correct one for the aircraft condition. I was again assigned to Aircraft X in ZZZ and I was conducting my preflight inspection. I was reviewing MELs and maintenance records and it suddenly struck me that the attendant call button might not be possible to defer. I reviewed the Minimum Equipment List and noted that MEL 25-XXX applied to 'Cabin reading lights; light lens covers; and lav occupied lights may be inoperative provided enough light is available for safe working conditions during night operation.' Consequently the MEL did not apply to the flight attendant call button in the forward lav. A review of the records indicated that Aircraft X had conducted numerous flights since the MEL 25-XXXX had been applied to the aircraft.I checked the expiration date of the Non-essential Equipment Furnishing; noted that it was still within limits before expiration; and I didn't investigate farther. Consequently I conducted the flights listed above.I contacted local maintenance personnel and Maintenance Control and informed them of the situation; stating that I would not be able to fly the airplane until the issue was corrected and I could legally fly the airplane. Subsequently; the forward lav was locked out and deferred in accordance with MEL XX-XX; paperwork was completed and I subsequently conducted all the following scheduled flights for the day; although the flight was delayed due to the maintenance issue. This has been a recurring issue with incorrect MEL/NEF guidance from Maintenance Control which result in aircraft flying when they are legally required to be repaired; grounded; or a more a more restrictive action is due to be applied.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.