37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1737532 |
Time | |
Date | 202003 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | PIT.Airport |
State Reference | PA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Light Transport |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 60 Flight Crew Total 4000 Flight Crew Type 300 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Procedural Security Deviation - Procedural FAR Ground Incursion Taxiway |
Narrative:
After landing on runway 32 at pit; ATC cleared us to remain with their frequency and taxi to FBO via taxiway november. Given the poorly labeled taxiway we followed the lines thinking we were on taxiway november; as it happens we were [on] N2 and taxied onto the no civilian aircraft zone. The cause of this incident was two-fold. One; the area isn't properly identified as a no-go zone for civilian aircraft. Additionally; some foresight during planning would have recognized the possibility of this occurring. Secondly; ATC should not have issued such instruction as though we were familiar with the area; we were not.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Corporate Jet Captain reported a taxiway incursion at PIT airport. The crew taxied onto to Taxiway N2 versus N as cleared. Captain cited poor taxiway signage/labeling as a contributing factor.
Narrative: After Landing on Runway 32 at PIT; ATC cleared us to remain with their frequency and taxi to FBO via Taxiway November. Given the poorly labeled taxiway we followed the lines thinking we were on Taxiway November; as it happens we were [on] N2 and taxied onto the no civilian aircraft zone. The cause of this incident was two-fold. One; the area isn't properly identified as a no-go zone for civilian aircraft. Additionally; some foresight during planning would have recognized the possibility of this occurring. Secondly; ATC should not have issued such instruction as though we were familiar with the area; we were not.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.