37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1745873 |
Time | |
Date | 202006 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.ARTCC |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | UAV - Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Route In Use | None |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Private |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 3 Flight Crew Total 3200 Flight Crew Type 26 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Airspace Violation All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict |
Miss Distance | Horizontal 1 Vertical 1000 |
Narrative:
[We were] requested to fly to map the perimeter of the fire. PIC was informed that the tfr was in place and clearance was issued to launch. The aircraft was launched and began to climb to its mission altitude.within minutes of takeoff traffic was observed inside the boundary of the tfr. Since this was not expected the crew and PIC took measures to avoid conflict with the traffic and made slight adjustments in course and altitude to avoid. Positive visual separation was achieved with the use of a ground observer and the uas camera system.once conflict was mitigated further effort was made to determine if an incursion had occurred. It was identified that an error was made and that the tfr was not activated as claimed. Immediate recovery of the uas was conducted and the aircraft was safely landed at the intended landing site. In order to correct and avoid another instance of this event we have implemented a procedure to confirm valid activation of the tfr before every flight operation is conducted.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: UAV operator reported a TFR miscommunication that resulted in an airborne conflict with an aircraft.
Narrative: [We were] requested to fly to map the perimeter of the fire. PIC was informed that the TFR was in place and clearance was issued to launch. The aircraft was launched and began to climb to its mission altitude.Within minutes of takeoff traffic was observed inside the boundary of the TFR. Since this was not expected the crew and PIC took measures to avoid conflict with the traffic and made slight adjustments in course and altitude to avoid. Positive visual separation was achieved with the use of a ground observer and the UAS camera system.Once conflict was mitigated further effort was made to determine if an incursion had occurred. It was identified that an error was made and that the TFR was not activated as claimed. Immediate recovery of the UAS was conducted and the aircraft was safely landed at the intended landing site. In order to correct and avoid another instance of this event we have implemented a procedure to confirm valid activation of the TFR before every flight operation is conducted.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.