37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1754998 |
Time | |
Date | 202008 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Other Rejected Takeoff |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying First Officer |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Crew rejected the takeoff due to flex not set caution advisory during the takeoff roll. At initial thrust setting the #1 thrust lever would not seat properly in the flex detent. Ca adjusted the thrust lever and got proper indication that flex was set properly; first officer made the flex set call out. After accelerating through 80 knots the crew received a caution advisory that the thrust was not set; ca initiated a reject in response to the caution advisory. Crew returned to the gate for follow-up maintenance.after having reduced flying due to a limited flight schedule; there is a higher potential for errors; therefore as captain; I decided to take a more cautious approach and rejected the takeoff.suggestions - place more of an emphasis on rejected takeoff considerations during crew brief.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Air carrier flight crew reported a rejected takeoff due to a thrust setting caution advisory.
Narrative: Crew rejected the takeoff due to FLEX not set Caution Advisory during the takeoff roll. At initial thrust setting the #1 thrust lever would not seat properly in the FLEX Detent. CA adjusted the thrust lever and got proper indication that FLEX was set properly; FO made the FLEX Set call out. After accelerating through 80 knots the crew received a caution advisory that the thrust was not set; CA initiated a reject in response to the caution advisory. Crew returned to the gate for follow-up maintenance.After having reduced flying due to a limited flight schedule; there is a higher potential for errors; therefore as Captain; I decided to take a more cautious approach and rejected the takeoff.Suggestions - Place more of an emphasis on rejected takeoff considerations during crew brief.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.