37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1759807 |
Time | |
Date | 202009 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.ARTCC |
State Reference | US |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Light Transport Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Enroute |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Experience | Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 15.33 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict |
Narrative:
I plugged in on sector X after getting my weather briefing. The right side started the briefing as I was getting familiar with the position. Since traffic has dropped and picked back up from covid my area often works in unusual configurations to manage traffic. I plugged into sector X and noticed that I was going to working low altitude Y and two high altitude sectors X and Z. This meant I was going to be working the ground to FL370. I was listening to the briefing and scanning the board when I saw two aircraft flashing. The controller had issued descend via the ZZZZZ3 to aircraft Y at FL320 with clearance to 16;000 in our airspace and descend via the ZZZZZ1 to aircraft X at FL340 converging together east of ZZZ3 VOR. I had not even gotten to the point of scanning the data blocks yet in the briefing because I would have mentioned this as appearing to be unsafe. Aircraft X started down as the two aircraft were converging (which started the flashing) and the r-side told aircraft X to maintain FL330 when they were out of FL334. I worried that the aircraft wouldn't be able to stop their descent in time; but the pilot read back something like; 'okay stopping at FL330.' the pilot didn't say they couldn't stop the descent and the controller assumed that the pilot didn't need a traffic call because they would be able to level off in time. The r-side giving me the briefing said I thought these two procedures were separated. I told them that aircraft X was direct zzzzz for the ZZZZZ3 which negates the prior restrictions and would make that a pilot's discretion descent to zzzzz. The aircraft came from area [a] which is required to have the aircraft on full routing or apreq the shortcut. Area [a] didn't apreq the shortcut and the r-side didn't notice the abbreviated routing. Aircraft X descended to FL328 and told the controller that they got an RA. The r-side was finishing the briefing at this time and unplugged to I called traffic to aircraft Y when they were approximately 1 NM past each other.area [a] should leave aircraft on the appropriate routing or apreq the shortcut. I see multiple times in each work day where aircraft are not on the right routing and I do not get a call to apreq it. This is a recurring problem. Also; my area changes the configuration constantly throughout the shift to keep sectors from going 'red.' I appreciate that the supervisor or controller in charge is trying to prevent a red sector but constantly changing configurations is confusing. Since march I have only worked this configuration (Y/X/Z) one other time and it is starting to seem like there is no consistency in the area. Lastly; the r-side should have read the routes of the two aircraft and not issued the descend via clearance to aircraft X. Aircraft X started down earlier than expected but well within their ability and aircraft Y stayed much higher than normal. Both aircraft did everything right. The two clearances are not separated when a shortcut is issued.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Center Controller reported that during a controller de-brief/switch an airborne conflict occurred due to the distraction.
Narrative: I plugged in on Sector X after getting my weather briefing. The R side started the briefing as I was getting familiar with the position. Since traffic has dropped and picked back up from COVID my area often works in unusual configurations to manage traffic. I plugged into Sector X and noticed that I was going to working low altitude Y and two high altitude sectors X and Z. This meant I was going to be working the ground to FL370. I was listening to the briefing and scanning the board when I saw two aircraft flashing. The Controller had issued descend via the ZZZZZ3 to Aircraft Y at FL320 with clearance to 16;000 in our airspace and descend via the ZZZZZ1 to Aircraft X at FL340 converging together east of ZZZ3 VOR. I had not even gotten to the point of scanning the data blocks yet in the briefing because I would have mentioned this as appearing to be unsafe. Aircraft X started down as the two aircraft were converging (which started the flashing) and the R-side told Aircraft X to maintain FL330 when they were out of FL334. I worried that the aircraft wouldn't be able to stop their descent in time; but the pilot read back something like; 'Okay stopping at FL330.' The pilot didn't say they couldn't stop the descent and the Controller assumed that the pilot didn't need a traffic call because they would be able to level off in time. The R-side giving me the briefing said I thought these two procedures were separated. I told them that Aircraft X was direct ZZZZZ for the ZZZZZ3 which negates the prior restrictions and would make that a pilot's discretion descent to ZZZZZ. The aircraft came from Area [A] which is required to have the aircraft on full routing or APREQ the shortcut. Area [A] didn't APREQ the shortcut and the R-side didn't notice the abbreviated routing. Aircraft X descended to FL328 and told the controller that they got an RA. The R-side was finishing the briefing at this time and unplugged to I called traffic to Aircraft Y when they were approximately 1 NM past each other.Area [A] should leave aircraft on the appropriate routing or APREQ the shortcut. I see multiple times in each work day where aircraft are not on the right routing and I do not get a call to APREQ it. This is a recurring problem. Also; my area changes the configuration constantly throughout the shift to keep sectors from going 'red.' I appreciate that the Supervisor or CIC is trying to prevent a red sector but constantly changing configurations is confusing. Since March I have only worked this configuration (Y/X/Z) one other time and it is starting to seem like there is no consistency in the area. Lastly; the R-side should have read the routes of the two aircraft and not issued the descend via clearance to Aircraft X. Aircraft X started down earlier than expected but well within their ability and Aircraft Y stayed much higher than normal. Both aircraft did everything right. The two clearances are not separated when a shortcut is issued.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.