37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1762536 |
Time | |
Date | 202009 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | FO |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural FAR Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
In flight between ZZZZ-ZZZZ1; we received an ACARS message from duty pilot stating that there was going to be an issue with my duty time compliance. I called scheduling and duty pilot. He explained that the X foreign government had moved our departure slot time out of ZZZZ1 later by 90 minutes; and this would not allow me to return to ZZZZ to start my scheduled duty time compliance in time to be legal. Duty pilot; advised me that the operations was involved and in contact with the FAA and all were working on a solution. After about an hour I received a call back. They looked at moving the airplane to ZZZZ2 or deplaning the crew to go into rest. Both of these requests were denied by the foreign country. I was advised by duty pilot; that we as a crew did nothing wrong and were legal to operate ZZZZ-ZZZZ1 at the time of departure. He said my only option was to continue the flight back to ZZZZ and file a report. The return leg was uneventful and I entered my rest period less than 1 hour later than what was legal.in doing a 7 day look back; crew scheduling had ample opportunity to better schedule my previous duty time compliance; so that a 90 minute delay would not have caused this issue. In our defense; we were not able to convince the foreign government to file a flight plan to ZZZZ2 and due to the covid-19 pandemic; the crew was not allowed to get off the aircraft in ZZZZ1.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Air carrier First Officer reported an issue relating to duty time compliance.
Narrative: In flight between ZZZZ-ZZZZ1; we received an ACARS message from Duty Pilot stating that there was going to be an issue with my duty time compliance. I called scheduling and Duty Pilot. He explained that the X foreign government had moved our departure slot time out of ZZZZ1 later by 90 minutes; and this would not allow me to return to ZZZZ to start my scheduled duty time compliance in time to be legal. Duty Pilot; advised me that the Operations was involved and in contact with the FAA and all were working on a solution. After about an hour I received a call back. They looked at moving the airplane to ZZZZ2 or deplaning the crew to go into rest. Both of these requests were denied by the foreign country. I was advised by Duty Pilot; that we as a crew did nothing wrong and were legal to operate ZZZZ-ZZZZ1 at the time of departure. He said my only option was to continue the flight back to ZZZZ and file a report. The return leg was uneventful and I entered my rest period less than 1 hour later than what was legal.In doing a 7 day look back; crew scheduling had ample opportunity to better schedule my previous duty time compliance; so that a 90 minute delay would not have caused this issue. In our defense; we were not able to convince the foreign government to file a flight plan to ZZZZ2 and due to the COVID-19 pandemic; the crew was not allowed to get off the aircraft in ZZZZ1.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.