37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 181999 |
Time | |
Date | 199106 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : lax |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 5000 msl bound upper : 5000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : lax |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Route In Use | arrival other arrival star : star |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : flight engineer pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 9100 flight time type : 650 |
ASRS Report | 181999 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
I am flying aircraft that are now more frequently TCAS-equipped. It's a good system, however I am seeing a lot of TA's on non mode C equipped intruders. West/O altitude information, TCAS cannot separate us, and it is difficult for us to find the traffic visually. In the above case on approach to lax, because of the shape of the TCA in that area and the prevailing WX conditions, and the fact that we could not see any traffic at 12 O'clock and closing, we assumed that the intruder was low, below the overcast. We never found out where he was, and ATC was too busy to call out traffic to allow us to ask about it. It puts us in a real quandary when we get a TA with no altitude, 12 O'clock, closing. If we can't see him--we almost never can--do we try to turn to avoid him? Is the TCAS bearing accurate enough for that kind of maneuver? Which way do we turn? Until either all aircraft above, below or in our airspace have mode C or until we all get TCAS 3 (which will give horizontal RA's), we're going to be guessing and hoping. Our airline's procedures and training do not adequately cover this situation.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: REPORTER QUESTIONS RESPONSE NEEDED ON A TCASII TA ON NON MODE C ACFT.
Narrative: I AM FLYING ACFT THAT ARE NOW MORE FREQUENTLY TCAS-EQUIPPED. IT'S A GOOD SYS, HOWEVER I AM SEEING A LOT OF TA'S ON NON MODE C EQUIPPED INTRUDERS. W/O ALT INFO, TCAS CANNOT SEPARATE US, AND IT IS DIFFICULT FOR US TO FIND THE TFC VISUALLY. IN THE ABOVE CASE ON APCH TO LAX, BECAUSE OF THE SHAPE OF THE TCA IN THAT AREA AND THE PREVAILING WX CONDITIONS, AND THE FACT THAT WE COULD NOT SEE ANY TFC AT 12 O'CLOCK AND CLOSING, WE ASSUMED THAT THE INTRUDER WAS LOW, BELOW THE OVCST. WE NEVER FOUND OUT WHERE HE WAS, AND ATC WAS TOO BUSY TO CALL OUT TFC TO ALLOW US TO ASK ABOUT IT. IT PUTS US IN A REAL QUANDARY WHEN WE GET A TA WITH NO ALT, 12 O'CLOCK, CLOSING. IF WE CAN'T SEE HIM--WE ALMOST NEVER CAN--DO WE TRY TO TURN TO AVOID HIM? IS THE TCAS BEARING ACCURATE ENOUGH FOR THAT KIND OF MANEUVER? WHICH WAY DO WE TURN? UNTIL EITHER ALL ACFT ABOVE, BELOW OR IN OUR AIRSPACE HAVE MODE C OR UNTIL WE ALL GET TCAS 3 (WHICH WILL GIVE HORIZ RA'S), WE'RE GOING TO BE GUESSING AND HOPING. OUR AIRLINE'S PROCS AND TRNING DO NOT ADEQUATELY COVER THIS SITUATION.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.