37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 193914 |
Time | |
Date | 199111 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : azo |
State Reference | MI |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : azo |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing other |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : student |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 35 flight time total : 100 flight time type : 8 |
ASRS Report | 193914 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : landing without clearance non adherence : far non adherence : clearance |
Independent Detector | other controllera other other : unspecified cockpit |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
I was flying an small aircraft. I was returning from a cross country training flight and in talking to kalamazoo approach was given vectors for runway 23. I missed the directions from approach to switch radio to tower and continued to land without clearance. No accident or near accident occurred. I've flown out of this airport for 2 months and have become familiar with the area and procedures and never missed a radio call before. I talked to an accident prevention counselor and we decided that what happens is pilots let the controllers fly the airplane instead of ourselves and this passive behavior causes such incidents. This may be what happened to me. I should have kept an aggressive attitude and my mind on what I'm doing and should be doing. I also learned that the tower was trying to get me to respond on the tower frequency. I think in this situation it may be a good idea to call the plane on the previous frequency, in this case approach control.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: SPI DOES NOT CHANGE TO TWR FREQ WHEN INSTRUCTED. LANDS WITHOUT CLRNC.
Narrative: I WAS FLYING AN SMA. I WAS RETURNING FROM A XCOUNTRY TRAINING FLT AND IN TALKING TO KALAMAZOO APCH WAS GIVEN VECTORS FOR RWY 23. I MISSED THE DIRECTIONS FROM APCH TO SWITCH RADIO TO TWR AND CONTINUED TO LAND WITHOUT CLRNC. NO ACCIDENT OR NEAR ACCIDENT OCCURRED. I'VE FLOWN OUT OF THIS ARPT FOR 2 MONTHS AND HAVE BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE AREA AND PROCS AND NEVER MISSED A RADIO CALL BEFORE. I TALKED TO AN ACCIDENT PREVENTION COUNSELOR AND WE DECIDED THAT WHAT HAPPENS IS PLTS LET THE CTLRS FLY THE AIRPLANE INSTEAD OF OURSELVES AND THIS PASSIVE BEHAVIOR CAUSES SUCH INCIDENTS. THIS MAY BE WHAT HAPPENED TO ME. I SHOULD HAVE KEPT AN AGGRESSIVE ATTITUDE AND MY MIND ON WHAT I'M DOING AND SHOULD BE DOING. I ALSO LEARNED THAT THE TWR WAS TRYING TO GET ME TO RESPOND ON THE TWR FREQ. I THINK IN THIS SITUATION IT MAY BE A GOOD IDEA TO CALL THE PLANE ON THE PREVIOUS FREQ, IN THIS CASE APCH CTL.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.