37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 219197 |
Time | |
Date | 199208 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : f67 |
State Reference | TX |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : dfw tracon : har |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | Small Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing other |
Route In Use | arrival other |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 2500 flight time type : 200 |
ASRS Report | 219176 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 90 flight time total : 5500 flight time type : 400 |
ASRS Report | 218938 |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : runway other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : became reoriented flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
On a visual approach into arlington municipal (F54) the captain, not flying at the time, and I mistakenly idented grand prairie airport (F67) as F54 and landed our small transport at grand prairie. We were vectored for a visual approach into arlington by dallas approach. When we saw an airport at our 12 O'clock position that appeared to be arlington, we cancelled IFR with dallas and proceeded with the visual approach. We were about 4 mi ene of grand prairie at the time. The captain called arlington unicom, got an airport advisory, and reported our position throughout the approach. I landed the airplane and, upon taxiing up to the ramp, we realized that we were at the wrong airport by the markings on the ramp that said grand prairie. We then departed VFR and landed at arlington a few mins and 3 mi later. I feel the factors contributing to the event were the fact that : 1. Neither the captain or I bothered to verify our location in relationship to arlington with ATC or with the LORAN. 2. Neither the captain or I had been to arlington (F54) in the day time, making it difficult to identify it from the neighboring airports. 3. ATC did not tell us our position in relation to arlington before or after we cancelled IFR. Corrective actions: 1. Avoiding complacency in the cockpit (we fly all over the country everyday). 2. Better crew coordination: assign specific duties to the flying and non- flying pilot. 3. Have ATC give your position when you cancel IFR for a visual approach.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN SMT, ON APCH TO ARLINGTON, TX, LANDED AT GRAND PRAIRIE.
Narrative: ON A VISUAL APCH INTO ARLINGTON MUNICIPAL (F54) THE CAPT, NOT FLYING AT THE TIME, AND I MISTAKENLY IDENTED GRAND PRAIRIE ARPT (F67) AS F54 AND LANDED OUR SMT AT GRAND PRAIRIE. WE WERE VECTORED FOR A VISUAL APCH INTO ARLINGTON BY DALLAS APCH. WHEN WE SAW AN ARPT AT OUR 12 O'CLOCK POS THAT APPEARED TO BE ARLINGTON, WE CANCELLED IFR WITH DALLAS AND PROCEEDED WITH THE VISUAL APCH. WE WERE ABOUT 4 MI ENE OF GRAND PRAIRIE AT THE TIME. THE CAPT CALLED ARLINGTON UNICOM, GOT AN ARPT ADVISORY, AND RPTED OUR POS THROUGHOUT THE APCH. I LANDED THE AIRPLANE AND, UPON TAXIING UP TO THE RAMP, WE REALIZED THAT WE WERE AT THE WRONG ARPT BY THE MARKINGS ON THE RAMP THAT SAID GRAND PRAIRIE. WE THEN DEPARTED VFR AND LANDED AT ARLINGTON A FEW MINS AND 3 MI LATER. I FEEL THE FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO THE EVENT WERE THE FACT THAT : 1. NEITHER THE CAPT OR I BOTHERED TO VERIFY OUR LOCATION IN RELATIONSHIP TO ARLINGTON WITH ATC OR WITH THE LORAN. 2. NEITHER THE CAPT OR I HAD BEEN TO ARLINGTON (F54) IN THE DAY TIME, MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO IDENT IT FROM THE NEIGHBORING ARPTS. 3. ATC DID NOT TELL US OUR POS IN RELATION TO ARLINGTON BEFORE OR AFTER WE CANCELLED IFR. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: 1. AVOIDING COMPLACENCY IN THE COCKPIT (WE FLY ALL OVER THE COUNTRY EVERYDAY). 2. BETTER CREW COORD: ASSIGN SPECIFIC DUTIES TO THE FLYING AND NON- FLYING PLT. 3. HAVE ATC GIVE YOUR POS WHEN YOU CANCEL IFR FOR A VISUAL APCH.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.