Narrative:

En route from fsd to oma, I experienced a vacuum pump failure while in IMC conditions at 4000 ft MSL. I was in contact with omaha approach and explained my situation. My stated intentions were to use the ILS 32L approach to eppley airfield, or if that didn't work, a PAR 30 no-gyroscope approach to 30 at offutt AFB, then SVFR to eppley. As my gyroscope instruments finally tumbled, I decided to forego the ILS and then requested the PAR 3C no-gyroscope to offutt. The controllers were very helpful and I proceeded through the approach without any further problems. Upon breaking out and calling the runway in sight the controller cleared me for the option. I had already stated my intention of SVFR to eppley so I proceeded as planned -- that was the problem. The WX had deteriorated to worse than advertised (approximately 500 scattered with more layers above that). I followed the river (missouri) towards eppley. The low clouds forced me to fly lower than I wanted. I flew between 300-400 ft AGL approximately. This put me uncomfortably close to the various bridges, crossing the river. I finally made it to eppley and landed without any further problems. I feel rather stupid for not landing at offutt when I had the chance. In retrospect, I can see I pushed myself too much to deliver my cargo. I can also see I pushed the rules -- the SVFR was ok, but I was too close to the ground. I think the mechanical problems I dealt with rather easily. This may have boosted my confidence for an 'easy' short VFR hop. In the future I won't push my luck. I'll land while I have the chance.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: PLT OF ATX SMA ACFT OPERATED BELOW MIN REQUIRED ALT DUE TO STAYING UNDER AN OVCST ENRTE TO DEST ARPT AFTER ATC HAD DSNDED THE ACFT TO VFR CONDITIONS.

Narrative: ENRTE FROM FSD TO OMA, I EXPERIENCED A VACUUM PUMP FAILURE WHILE IN IMC CONDITIONS AT 4000 FT MSL. I WAS IN CONTACT WITH OMAHA APCH AND EXPLAINED MY SITUATION. MY STATED INTENTIONS WERE TO USE THE ILS 32L APCH TO EPPLEY AIRFIELD, OR IF THAT DIDN'T WORK, A PAR 30 NO-GYROSCOPE APCH TO 30 AT OFFUTT AFB, THEN SVFR TO EPPLEY. AS MY GYROSCOPE INSTS FINALLY TUMBLED, I DECIDED TO FOREGO THE ILS AND THEN REQUESTED THE PAR 3C NO-GYROSCOPE TO OFFUTT. THE CTLRS WERE VERY HELPFUL AND I PROCEEDED THROUGH THE APCH WITHOUT ANY FURTHER PROBLEMS. UPON BREAKING OUT AND CALLING THE RWY IN SIGHT THE CTLR CLRED ME FOR THE OPTION. I HAD ALREADY STATED MY INTENTION OF SVFR TO EPPLEY SO I PROCEEDED AS PLANNED -- THAT WAS THE PROBLEM. THE WX HAD DETERIORATED TO WORSE THAN ADVERTISED (APPROX 500 SCATTERED WITH MORE LAYERS ABOVE THAT). I FOLLOWED THE RIVER (MISSOURI) TOWARDS EPPLEY. THE LOW CLOUDS FORCED ME TO FLY LOWER THAN I WANTED. I FLEW BTWN 300-400 FT AGL APPROX. THIS PUT ME UNCOMFORTABLY CLOSE TO THE VARIOUS BRIDGES, XING THE RIVER. I FINALLY MADE IT TO EPPLEY AND LANDED WITHOUT ANY FURTHER PROBLEMS. I FEEL RATHER STUPID FOR NOT LNDG AT OFFUTT WHEN I HAD THE CHANCE. IN RETROSPECT, I CAN SEE I PUSHED MYSELF TOO MUCH TO DELIVER MY CARGO. I CAN ALSO SEE I PUSHED THE RULES -- THE SVFR WAS OK, BUT I WAS TOO CLOSE TO THE GND. I THINK THE MECHANICAL PROBLEMS I DEALT WITH RATHER EASILY. THIS MAY HAVE BOOSTED MY CONFIDENCE FOR AN 'EASY' SHORT VFR HOP. IN THE FUTURE I WON'T PUSH MY LUCK. I'LL LAND WHILE I HAVE THE CHANCE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.