37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 233871 |
Time | |
Date | 199302 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : dfw |
State Reference | TX |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 2000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : dfw tower : dsm |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : straight in |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 220 flight time total : 6000 flight time type : 700 |
ASRS Report | 233871 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Chart Or Publication |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
Landing at dfw, in response to air carrier request to exercise autoland system, we executed an autoland. Our F-4 messages indicated a recent prohibition by FAA which stated no CAT III approachs by medium large transport aircraft. Since the WX was reported 600 overcast, 5 mi visibility, we determined such a maneuver to be legal and in compliance with the restriction. This report is submitted in case there is a question of interpretation regarding the FAA prohibition of CAT III approach for medium large transport aircraft. If this is the case, corrective action would be a clrer, more comprehensive definition of the prohibition by FAA. Further, air carrier company procedure should not request such a procedure when prohibited.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CREW SHOOTS A CAT III APCH AT THE REQUEST OF THEIR COMPANY.
Narrative: LNDG AT DFW, IN RESPONSE TO ACR REQUEST TO EXERCISE AUTOLAND SYS, WE EXECUTED AN AUTOLAND. OUR F-4 MESSAGES INDICATED A RECENT PROHIBITION BY FAA WHICH STATED NO CAT III APCHS BY MLG ACFT. SINCE THE WX WAS RPTED 600 OVCST, 5 MI VISIBILITY, WE DETERMINED SUCH A MANEUVER TO BE LEGAL AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE RESTRICTION. THIS RPT IS SUBMITTED IN CASE THERE IS A QUESTION OF INTERP REGARDING THE FAA PROHIBITION OF CAT III APCH FOR MLG ACFT. IF THIS IS THE CASE, CORRECTIVE ACTION WOULD BE A CLRER, MORE COMPREHENSIVE DEFINITION OF THE PROHIBITION BY FAA. FURTHER, ACR COMPANY PROC SHOULD NOT REQUEST SUCH A PROC WHEN PROHIBITED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.