37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 236598 |
Time | |
Date | 199303 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : phl |
State Reference | PA |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Light Transport, High Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | ground other : taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 185 flight time total : 9000 flight time type : 5240 |
ASRS Report | 236598 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Airport |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Situations | |
Airport | other physical facility |
Narrative:
Landing at phl at night, we were cleared to land runway 9R and were advised by tower that only ff, gg, and the last taxiway were available due to snow. Upon landing we had problems reading the taxiway signs because they were not lighted. The tower asked us if we were going to clear the runway because an aircraft was on 1/2 mi final behind us, and we were hesitating. The copilot said yes we were clearing when actually he should have verified the taxiway was gg or ff. I felt pressured to turn off the taxiway we thought was ff but was actually cc. There was no problem on cc other than a small ridge of snow from plowing which I crossed over without problem. In the future if I am not sure of a taxiway I will inform the tower and if necessary let the aircraft behind me go around. It also would help if airports could keep their taxiway signs lighted. I am a 6 yr commuter pilot and deal with phl every week it's easy to fall into the pressure of trying to help the tower if able. And nobody wants to make the aircraft behind them go around, but in this case it would have been the best decision.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLC OF ACR LTT ACFT INADVERTENTLY TURNED OFF ON CLOSED TXWY AFTER LNDG DUE TO HURRY IN CLRING THE RWY FOR LNDG TFC AND UNLIGHTED SIGNS TO IDENT THE PROPER TXWY.
Narrative: LNDG AT PHL AT NIGHT, WE WERE CLRED TO LAND RWY 9R AND WERE ADVISED BY TWR THAT ONLY FF, GG, AND THE LAST TXWY WERE AVAILABLE DUE TO SNOW. UPON LNDG WE HAD PROBS READING THE TXWY SIGNS BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT LIGHTED. THE TWR ASKED US IF WE WERE GOING TO CLR THE RWY BECAUSE AN ACFT WAS ON 1/2 MI FINAL BEHIND US, AND WE WERE HESITATING. THE COPLT SAID YES WE WERE CLRING WHEN ACTUALLY HE SHOULD HAVE VERIFIED THE TXWY WAS GG OR FF. I FELT PRESSURED TO TURN OFF THE TXWY WE THOUGHT WAS FF BUT WAS ACTUALLY CC. THERE WAS NO PROB ON CC OTHER THAN A SMALL RIDGE OF SNOW FROM PLOWING WHICH I CROSSED OVER WITHOUT PROB. IN THE FUTURE IF I AM NOT SURE OF A TXWY I WILL INFORM THE TWR AND IF NECESSARY LET THE ACFT BEHIND ME GAR. IT ALSO WOULD HELP IF ARPTS COULD KEEP THEIR TXWY SIGNS LIGHTED. I AM A 6 YR COMMUTER PLT AND DEAL WITH PHL EVERY WK IT'S EASY TO FALL INTO THE PRESSURE OF TRYING TO HELP THE TWR IF ABLE. AND NOBODY WANTS TO MAKE THE ACFT BEHIND THEM GAR, BUT IN THIS CASE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE BEST DECISION.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.