37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 241466 |
Time | |
Date | 199305 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : phl |
State Reference | PA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 5000 msl bound upper : 5000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Transport, High Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | enroute airway : phl |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : commercial pilot : flight engineer pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time total : 6000 flight time type : 1000 |
ASRS Report | 241466 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe non adherence other other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : overcame equipment problem |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation other |
Narrative:
Aircraft had an MEL that passenger door seal was leaking and should not be flown in pressurized flight. Aircraft write-up stated that when differential pressure rose above 1.5 door seal would leak, inoperative sign was on pressure controller. The captain elected to fly pressurized and when climbing through 4000 ft door seal started leaking. Flight attendant notified captain of such and he elected to decrease differential pressure (2.5 back to 1.6) and continue climbing to 8000 ft. I told him that if he wished to do this he should at least stop his climb at 6000 ft or less to decrease differential pressure and the loud noise that could be heard through the intercom. He elected to continue the climb and continue to decrease differential to 2.0. This did do away with a lot of the noise, but not all. Do not think aircraft should be pressurized at all when known pressure leak is discrepancy. Aircraft flts that are scheduled should be flown at reduced altitudes. Flight attendant stated during and after flight that much passenger concern and discomfort was experienced.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CAPT OF AN ACR MDT ACFT ELECTED TO PARTIALLY PRESSURIZ THE ACFT EVEN THOUGH THE ACFT WAS 'MEL-ED' FOR NON PRESSURIZATION FLT DUE TO A LEAKY MAIN CABIN DOOR SEAL.
Narrative: ACFT HAD AN MEL THAT PAX DOOR SEAL WAS LEAKING AND SHOULD NOT BE FLOWN IN PRESSURIZED FLT. ACFT WRITE-UP STATED THAT WHEN DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE ROSE ABOVE 1.5 DOOR SEAL WOULD LEAK, INOP SIGN WAS ON PRESSURE CTLR. THE CAPT ELECTED TO FLY PRESSURIZED AND WHEN CLBING THROUGH 4000 FT DOOR SEAL STARTED LEAKING. FLT ATTENDANT NOTIFIED CAPT OF SUCH AND HE ELECTED TO DECREASE DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE (2.5 BACK TO 1.6) AND CONTINUE CLBING TO 8000 FT. I TOLD HIM THAT IF HE WISHED TO DO THIS HE SHOULD AT LEAST STOP HIS CLB AT 6000 FT OR LESS TO DECREASE DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE AND THE LOUD NOISE THAT COULD BE HEARD THROUGH THE INTERCOM. HE ELECTED TO CONTINUE THE CLB AND CONTINUE TO DECREASE DIFFERENTIAL TO 2.0. THIS DID DO AWAY WITH A LOT OF THE NOISE, BUT NOT ALL. DO NOT THINK ACFT SHOULD BE PRESSURIZED AT ALL WHEN KNOWN PRESSURE LEAK IS DISCREPANCY. ACFT FLTS THAT ARE SCHEDULED SHOULD BE FLOWN AT REDUCED ALTS. FLT ATTENDANT STATED DURING AND AFTER FLT THAT MUCH PAX CONCERN AND DISCOMFORT WAS EXPERIENCED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.