37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 245327 |
Time | |
Date | 199306 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : ewr |
State Reference | NJ |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 400 agl bound upper : 400 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : ewr |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Widebody, Low Wing, 4 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | ground other : taxi landing other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : cfi pilot : flight engineer pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 210 flight time total : 10000 flight time type : 2000 |
ASRS Report | 245327 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : unable |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
First officer was PF on approach to runway 22L at ewr. We were behind an air carrier heavy jet that we could not see on the approach. As we got closer and were cleared to land, I tried to see if the preceding jet had cleared the runway. I could not see it until we were on a 1 mi final and he had turned 90 degrees to us onto a taxiway. The reported visibility was 4 mi with haze. The reason we could not see the widebody transport until only about 1 1/2 - 2 mi in front of us was that it was painted in the new gray air carrier paint scheme! Apparently, this paint job was designed by marketing types with no consideration for the safety issue. This paint scheme is much harder to see than air carrier's older while paint job because it is such a dark gray on top and lacks contrast with a hazy or low light/low visibility backgnd. Even the foreign air carrier paint scheme, which is similar, is much easier to see because it uses some lighter color. We must not wait until people die because of this 'stealth' paint scheme before it is changed! The air force should consider this color gray for their combat aircraft!
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ON APCH, THE PRECEDING WDB WAS INVISIBLE BECAUSE OF NEW PAINT SCHEME.
Narrative: FO WAS PF ON APCH TO RWY 22L AT EWR. WE WERE BEHIND AN ACR HVY JET THAT WE COULD NOT SEE ON THE APCH. AS WE GOT CLOSER AND WERE CLRED TO LAND, I TRIED TO SEE IF THE PRECEDING JET HAD CLRED THE RWY. I COULD NOT SEE IT UNTIL WE WERE ON A 1 MI FINAL AND HE HAD TURNED 90 DEGS TO US ONTO A TXWY. THE RPTED VISIBILITY WAS 4 MI WITH HAZE. THE REASON WE COULD NOT SEE THE WDB UNTIL ONLY ABOUT 1 1/2 - 2 MI IN FRONT OF US WAS THAT IT WAS PAINTED IN THE NEW GRAY ACR PAINT SCHEME! APPARENTLY, THIS PAINT JOB WAS DESIGNED BY MARKETING TYPES WITH NO CONSIDERATION FOR THE SAFETY ISSUE. THIS PAINT SCHEME IS MUCH HARDER TO SEE THAN ACR'S OLDER WHILE PAINT JOB BECAUSE IT IS SUCH A DARK GRAY ON TOP AND LACKS CONTRAST WITH A HAZY OR LOW LIGHT/LOW VISIBILITY BACKGND. EVEN THE FOREIGN ACR PAINT SCHEME, WHICH IS SIMILAR, IS MUCH EASIER TO SEE BECAUSE IT USES SOME LIGHTER COLOR. WE MUST NOT WAIT UNTIL PEOPLE DIE BECAUSE OF THIS 'STEALTH' PAINT SCHEME BEFORE IT IS CHANGED! THE AIR FORCE SHOULD CONSIDER THIS COLOR GRAY FOR THEIR COMBAT ACFT!
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.