37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 250611 |
Time | |
Date | 199309 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : atl |
State Reference | GA |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Transport, High Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
ASRS Report | 250611 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
In sum: reporter submitted his company's flight crew schedule for the months of june and august 1993 to show the method used to fill flight schedules of flight crew members on vacation by newly qualified pilots and what it subsequently causes to the schedule of 'junior' pilots holding so-called 'hard lines.' in addition, guidelines are set forth for crew members with military commitments! Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter stated that he submitted this report to bring to our attention the difficult crew schedule used by his company. The schedule causes great stress and fatigue among him and other crew members to the point that many are quitting who have 9 or more yrs with the company. He does not know how much more he can take! He is not getting proper sleep or food due to the short turn-arounds. However, the schedules are arranged to meet the FARS for duty time. Therefore, he and the other pilots have no recourse to refuse trips due to fatigue as they will be 'fired' by the company! He is not a union man, but believes that a strong union in this instance is the only possible hope for getting relief!
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLC MEMBER OF AN SMT ACR ACFT COMPLAINT REGARDING CREW SCHEDULING OF NEWLY QUALIFIED PLTS AND THE CONSEQUENCES TO 'JUNIOR' GRADE PLTS.
Narrative: IN SUM: RPTR SUBMITTED HIS COMPANY'S FLC SCHEDULE FOR THE MONTHS OF JUNE AND AUGUST 1993 TO SHOW THE METHOD USED TO FILL FLT SCHEDULES OF FLC MEMBERS ON VACATION BY NEWLY QUALIFIED PLTS AND WHAT IT SUBSEQUENTLY CAUSES TO THE SCHEDULE OF 'JUNIOR' PLTS HOLDING SO-CALLED 'HARD LINES.' IN ADDITION, GUIDELINES ARE SET FORTH FOR CREW MEMBERS WITH MIL COMMITMENTS! CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR STATED THAT HE SUBMITTED THIS RPT TO BRING TO OUR ATTN THE DIFFICULT CREW SCHEDULE USED BY HIS COMPANY. THE SCHEDULE CAUSES GREAT STRESS AND FATIGUE AMONG HIM AND OTHER CREW MEMBERS TO THE POINT THAT MANY ARE QUITTING WHO HAVE 9 OR MORE YRS WITH THE COMPANY. HE DOES NOT KNOW HOW MUCH MORE HE CAN TAKE! HE IS NOT GETTING PROPER SLEEP OR FOOD DUE TO THE SHORT TURN-AROUNDS. HOWEVER, THE SCHEDULES ARE ARRANGED TO MEET THE FARS FOR DUTY TIME. THEREFORE, HE AND THE OTHER PLTS HAVE NO RECOURSE TO REFUSE TRIPS DUE TO FATIGUE AS THEY WILL BE 'FIRED' BY THE COMPANY! HE IS NOT A UNION MAN, BUT BELIEVES THAT A STRONG UNION IN THIS INSTANCE IS THE ONLY POSSIBLE HOPE FOR GETTING RELIEF!
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.