Narrative:

We experienced a rough running engine and loss of RPM. We had just been vectored onto the localizer for runway 13L. Immediately when the engine quit, I took control from my student and began emergency restart procedures. Both engine fuel gauges were showing plenty of fuel. Left tank full, right tank less than 3/4 tank. We were running on the left tank so I immediately switched to the right tank. When I did, the engine quit completely. At this point, I thought I would switch back to the left tank so I would have at least a rough running engine than no engine. When I switched back to the left tank, the engine sputtered and surged a little, but at least it was running. This gave us the ability to get to a sod farm and land without incident. After landing, we did a visual walkaround and at this time noticed the left tank was low on fuel, even though the tank showed full. When the mechanic came out he drained approximately 3/4 of a gallon out of the left tank and noticed lots of sediment in the sample. I feel that faulty instrument indications were a contributing factor in the incident, and as a result of full indications, the left tank was run low which caused the sediment to be pulled from the tank into the engine causing the engine problem. On preflight inspection, no sediment was drawn from the tank. This could have been prevented by timing fuel burnout of each tank. In the future I will keep a written tally of how long I flew on each tank. Supplemental information from acn 250837: the FAA people arrived and performed their inspection.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ENG SPUTTERS AND STUTTERS. EMER OFF ARPT FORCED LNDG PERFORMED BY INSTRUCTOR PLT.

Narrative: WE EXPERIENCED A ROUGH RUNNING ENG AND LOSS OF RPM. WE HAD JUST BEEN VECTORED ONTO THE LOC FOR RWY 13L. IMMEDIATELY WHEN THE ENG QUIT, I TOOK CTL FROM MY STUDENT AND BEGAN EMER RESTART PROCS. BOTH ENG FUEL GAUGES WERE SHOWING PLENTY OF FUEL. L TANK FULL, R TANK LESS THAN 3/4 TANK. WE WERE RUNNING ON THE L TANK SO I IMMEDIATELY SWITCHED TO THE R TANK. WHEN I DID, THE ENG QUIT COMPLETELY. AT THIS POINT, I THOUGHT I WOULD SWITCH BACK TO THE L TANK SO I WOULD HAVE AT LEAST A ROUGH RUNNING ENG THAN NO ENG. WHEN I SWITCHED BACK TO THE L TANK, THE ENG SPUTTERED AND SURGED A LITTLE, BUT AT LEAST IT WAS RUNNING. THIS GAVE US THE ABILITY TO GET TO A SOD FARM AND LAND WITHOUT INCIDENT. AFTER LNDG, WE DID A VISUAL WALKAROUND AND AT THIS TIME NOTICED THE L TANK WAS LOW ON FUEL, EVEN THOUGH THE TANK SHOWED FULL. WHEN THE MECH CAME OUT HE DRAINED APPROX 3/4 OF A GALLON OUT OF THE L TANK AND NOTICED LOTS OF SEDIMENT IN THE SAMPLE. I FEEL THAT FAULTY INST INDICATIONS WERE A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR IN THE INCIDENT, AND AS A RESULT OF FULL INDICATIONS, THE L TANK WAS RUN LOW WHICH CAUSED THE SEDIMENT TO BE PULLED FROM THE TANK INTO THE ENG CAUSING THE ENG PROB. ON PREFLT INSPECTION, NO SEDIMENT WAS DRAWN FROM THE TANK. THIS COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED BY TIMING FUEL BURNOUT OF EACH TANK. IN THE FUTURE I WILL KEEP A WRITTEN TALLY OF HOW LONG I FLEW ON EACH TANK. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 250837: THE FAA PEOPLE ARRIVED AND PERFORMED THEIR INSPECTION.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.