A 'high time' private pilot complains about the violation actions and procedures used by the FAA aft...

Narrative:

During my oral examination with official of FSDO (examination was in connection with an incident on jun/xx/92 at westover air base which I reported to you in details on jun/xy/92), he told me 'I just pulled out from computer your record and it states:' incident on feb/xx/80, you did pay $100.00. In this incident I did loose my aircraft during hand propping on icy ground. Investigating this incident, lady lawyer came from jfk to GADO office, accusing me for several violations, and telling me to pay fine of $500.00 or face court action. Officiating during this meeting was then, mr. Y, GADO manager. There were also 4 men judges. I did refuse to pay fine, believing it is gndless, and I said I rather will go to the court. After lengthy persuasion I did agree to pay $100.00 (as said 'to pay her trip back to jfk') and case will be closed and never recorded. This was assurance from then chief of GADO. Unfortunately, I do find today that this incident has been recorded on my resume (record) contrary to the assurance by GADO manager. Very unpleasant. Computer records. My good examiner tells me violations recorded on aug/xx/87 over glens falls (warren county). Never but never was I informed formerly by FAA of such violation. I do not even know what it is about. I do recall once, over glens falls, I did contact albany airport 118.05 and I did inform them that I am in MVFR (marginal), but I was visual contact (sometimes obscure) with ground until my landing at schenectady, ny. Anyway, about both of those records from computer, I am waiting for answer from oklahoma city as well from jfk (freedom of press). My examiner told me also it is recent violations from westover military base on jun/xx/92. This case has not been solved. I am appealing it with NTSB with judicial review. It is already on my record as 'violations' never has it been provided to me. I am appealing and I never will subscribe to it. In my mind it is wrong to prematurely record as a violation, but of course I may be wrong, but I feel that I should inform you. Maybe I am right! And you will have a chance to look into it.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A 'HIGH TIME' PVT PLT COMPLAINS ABOUT THE VIOLATION ACTIONS AND PROCS USED BY THE FAA AFTER SEVERAL INCIDENTS IN WHICH HE WAS APPARENTLY INVOLVED AND DURING AN AIRMAN'S REEXAMINATION.

Narrative: DURING MY ORAL EXAMINATION WITH OFFICIAL OF FSDO (EXAMINATION WAS IN CONNECTION WITH AN INCIDENT ON JUN/XX/92 AT WESTOVER AIR BASE WHICH I RPTED TO YOU IN DETAILS ON JUN/XY/92), HE TOLD ME 'I JUST PULLED OUT FROM COMPUTER YOUR RECORD AND IT STATES:' INCIDENT ON FEB/XX/80, YOU DID PAY $100.00. IN THIS INCIDENT I DID LOOSE MY ACFT DURING HAND PROPPING ON ICY GND. INVESTIGATING THIS INCIDENT, LADY LAWYER CAME FROM JFK TO GADO OFFICE, ACCUSING ME FOR SEVERAL VIOLATIONS, AND TELLING ME TO PAY FINE OF $500.00 OR FACE COURT ACTION. OFFICIATING DURING THIS MEETING WAS THEN, MR. Y, GADO MGR. THERE WERE ALSO 4 MEN JUDGES. I DID REFUSE TO PAY FINE, BELIEVING IT IS GNDLESS, AND I SAID I RATHER WILL GO TO THE COURT. AFTER LENGTHY PERSUASION I DID AGREE TO PAY $100.00 (AS SAID 'TO PAY HER TRIP BACK TO JFK') AND CASE WILL BE CLOSED AND NEVER RECORDED. THIS WAS ASSURANCE FROM THEN CHIEF OF GADO. UNFORTUNATELY, I DO FIND TODAY THAT THIS INCIDENT HAS BEEN RECORDED ON MY RESUME (RECORD) CONTRARY TO THE ASSURANCE BY GADO MGR. VERY UNPLEASANT. COMPUTER RECORDS. MY GOOD EXAMINER TELLS ME VIOLATIONS RECORDED ON AUG/XX/87 OVER GLENS FALLS (WARREN COUNTY). NEVER BUT NEVER WAS I INFORMED FORMERLY BY FAA OF SUCH VIOLATION. I DO NOT EVEN KNOW WHAT IT IS ABOUT. I DO RECALL ONCE, OVER GLENS FALLS, I DID CONTACT ALBANY ARPT 118.05 AND I DID INFORM THEM THAT I AM IN MVFR (MARGINAL), BUT I WAS VISUAL CONTACT (SOMETIMES OBSCURE) WITH GND UNTIL MY LNDG AT SCHENECTADY, NY. ANYWAY, ABOUT BOTH OF THOSE RECORDS FROM COMPUTER, I AM WAITING FOR ANSWER FROM OKLAHOMA CITY AS WELL FROM JFK (FREEDOM OF PRESS). MY EXAMINER TOLD ME ALSO IT IS RECENT VIOLATIONS FROM WESTOVER MIL BASE ON JUN/XX/92. THIS CASE HAS NOT BEEN SOLVED. I AM APPEALING IT WITH NTSB WITH JUDICIAL REVIEW. IT IS ALREADY ON MY RECORD AS 'VIOLATIONS' NEVER HAS IT BEEN PROVIDED TO ME. I AM APPEALING AND I NEVER WILL SUBSCRIBE TO IT. IN MY MIND IT IS WRONG TO PREMATURELY RECORD AS A VIOLATION, BUT OF COURSE I MAY BE WRONG, BUT I FEEL THAT I SHOULD INFORM YOU. MAYBE I AM RIGHT! AND YOU WILL HAVE A CHANCE TO LOOK INTO IT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

Attributes
ACN	252562
Time
Date	199309
Day	Mon
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	airport : alb
State Reference	NH
Altitude	agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tower : dfw
Operator	general aviation : personal
Make Model Name	Small Aircraft
Flight Phase	other
Flight Plan	None
Person 1
Affiliation	Other
Function	flight crew : single pilot
Qualification	pilot : private
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 4 flight time total : 11675
ASRS Report	252562
Person 2
Affiliation	government : faa
Function	observation : air carrier inspector
Qualification	other other : other
Events
Anomaly	non adherence : far other anomaly other
Independent Detector	other flight crewa
Resolutory Action	other
Consequence	faa : reviewed incident with flight crew faa : investigated faa : assigned or threatened penalties
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

A 'high time' private pilot complains about the violation actions and procedures used by the FAA after several incidents in which he was apparently involved and during an airman's reexamination.