37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 262888 |
Time | |
Date | 199402 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : ord |
State Reference | IL |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 2100 msl bound upper : 2100 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : ord tower : ord |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B727 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing other |
Route In Use | approach : visual approach : straight in |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B747 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing other |
Route In Use | approach : straight in |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : flight engineer pilot : commercial pilot : atp pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 8000 flight time type : 200 |
ASRS Report | 262888 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : landing without clearance non adherence : far non adherence : clearance |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Cleared by chicago approach for visual to runway 27R at ord, #2 5- 6 mi behind 747. We were taking precautions behind the heavy jet to avoid wake turbulence. Approach did not specify frequency and position to call tower as is normally done on most approachs. However, we were chicago based crew and familiar with the routine. At the marker, I announced 'marker' gear down, final checklist. So started final checklist as we were configuring the flaps and establishing the GS. The 747 was close to exiting and was not considered a factor any more. At 1000 ft check, I responded 'cleared to land runway 27R.' did not realize that I hadn't heard 'clear to land' from tower. Everything normal and routine until landing rollout when I realized that we were still on approach control frequency. The first officer hadn't called the tower at the marker and neither I or the so caught it. Exiting the runway, I directed first officer to contact ground for taxi to gate. Ground responded with 'no comment' on landing clearance problems and we taxied to gate. We were apparently 'cleared to land' on tower frequency, but never responded (at least I assume that?) this was a first for me in any aircraft. The check/response should have caught this in the cockpit. The so initiating the list, as was called for, exactly at the marker and the confign changes contributed, as well as the total VFR mindset in place. First officer did not have marker switch on, which might have triggered a call.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: THE CAPT OF AN ACR LGT IS VERY CONTRITE AFTER LNDG WITHOUT CLRNC.
Narrative: CLRED BY CHICAGO APCH FOR VISUAL TO RWY 27R AT ORD, #2 5- 6 MI BEHIND 747. WE WERE TAKING PRECAUTIONS BEHIND THE HVY JET TO AVOID WAKE TURB. APCH DID NOT SPECIFY FREQ AND POS TO CALL TWR AS IS NORMALLY DONE ON MOST APCHS. HOWEVER, WE WERE CHICAGO BASED CREW AND FAMILIAR WITH THE ROUTINE. AT THE MARKER, I ANNOUNCED 'MARKER' GEAR DOWN, FINAL CHKLIST. SO STARTED FINAL CHKLIST AS WE WERE CONFIGURING THE FLAPS AND ESTABLISHING THE GS. THE 747 WAS CLOSE TO EXITING AND WAS NOT CONSIDERED A FACTOR ANY MORE. AT 1000 FT CHK, I RESPONDED 'CLRED TO LAND RWY 27R.' DID NOT REALIZE THAT I HADN'T HEARD 'CLR TO LAND' FROM TWR. EVERYTHING NORMAL AND ROUTINE UNTIL LNDG ROLLOUT WHEN I REALIZED THAT WE WERE STILL ON APCH CTL FREQ. THE FO HADN'T CALLED THE TWR AT THE MARKER AND NEITHER I OR THE SO CAUGHT IT. EXITING THE RWY, I DIRECTED FO TO CONTACT GND FOR TAXI TO GATE. GND RESPONDED WITH 'NO COMMENT' ON LNDG CLRNC PROBS AND WE TAXIED TO GATE. WE WERE APPARENTLY 'CLRED TO LAND' ON TWR FREQ, BUT NEVER RESPONDED (AT LEAST I ASSUME THAT?) THIS WAS A FIRST FOR ME IN ANY ACFT. THE CHK/RESPONSE SHOULD HAVE CAUGHT THIS IN THE COCKPIT. THE SO INITIATING THE LIST, AS WAS CALLED FOR, EXACTLY AT THE MARKER AND THE CONFIGN CHANGES CONTRIBUTED, AS WELL AS THE TOTAL VFR MINDSET IN PLACE. FO DID NOT HAVE MARKER SWITCH ON, WHICH MIGHT HAVE TRIGGERED A CALL.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.