37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 265970 |
Time | |
Date | 199403 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : sfo |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 1200 msl bound upper : 1200 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : oak tower : sfo tower : mdw |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B747 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 50 flight time total : 14000 flight time type : 9000 |
ASRS Report | 265970 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 21000 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
On approach to sfo runway 28R air carrier X sequenced behind an airplane arriving from the north. We were straight in from the southeast. Approach did a poor job and we ended up '3 1/2 mi behind a B747' with calm winds. I said we could not accept that. No comment from tower. I repeated that we could not accept that tight an interval. No comment. I requested an s-turn and from our angle, and after checking TCASII and the area behind aircraft abeam us approaching runway 28L, we did an s-turn to the south, left, and crossed centerline of runway 28L. Tower said we should have done an s-turn to the north. They said we were told that earlier, but we did not hear the north s-turn call from tower. Earlier, tower had made a comment about our radio being unclr. An uneventful landing on runway 28R ensued approach got us too close to the 747. Our problem: go around or s-turn? I should have s-turned away from the other runway. I should have heard the tower transmission. Sfo problem: saturation. Approach should have told us to go around. I think that 3 1/2 mi is less than minimum to follow a heavy.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: MULTIPLE RWY OP PARALLEL RWYS ACR X MADE S-TURN ON FINAL APCH IN FRONT OF TFC FOR THE PARALLEL RWY.
Narrative: ON APCH TO SFO RWY 28R ACR X SEQUENCED BEHIND AN AIRPLANE ARRIVING FROM THE N. WE WERE STRAIGHT IN FROM THE SE. APCH DID A POOR JOB AND WE ENDED UP '3 1/2 MI BEHIND A B747' WITH CALM WINDS. I SAID WE COULD NOT ACCEPT THAT. NO COMMENT FROM TWR. I REPEATED THAT WE COULD NOT ACCEPT THAT TIGHT AN INTERVAL. NO COMMENT. I REQUESTED AN S-TURN AND FROM OUR ANGLE, AND AFTER CHKING TCASII AND THE AREA BEHIND ACFT ABEAM US APCHING RWY 28L, WE DID AN S-TURN TO THE S, L, AND CROSSED CTRLINE OF RWY 28L. TWR SAID WE SHOULD HAVE DONE AN S-TURN TO THE N. THEY SAID WE WERE TOLD THAT EARLIER, BUT WE DID NOT HEAR THE N S-TURN CALL FROM TWR. EARLIER, TWR HAD MADE A COMMENT ABOUT OUR RADIO BEING UNCLR. AN UNEVENTFUL LNDG ON RWY 28R ENSUED APCH GOT US TOO CLOSE TO THE 747. OUR PROB: GAR OR S-TURN? I SHOULD HAVE S-TURNED AWAY FROM THE OTHER RWY. I SHOULD HAVE HEARD THE TWR XMISSION. SFO PROB: SATURATION. APCH SHOULD HAVE TOLD US TO GAR. I THINK THAT 3 1/2 MI IS LESS THAN MINIMUM TO FOLLOW A HVY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.