37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 276536 |
Time | |
Date | 199407 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : fll |
State Reference | FL |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 6000 msl bound upper : 6000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : mia |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | cruise other descent : approach |
Route In Use | enroute : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Other |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 180 flight time total : 11900 flight time type : 3900 |
ASRS Report | 276536 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : atp pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac inflight encounter : weather |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 400 vertical : 200 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation other |
Narrative:
Due to thunderstorms on the fll approach we were vectored to intercept the homey arrival into pbi and to expect radar vectors when past the WX. As part of my normal briefing procedures when in florida and prior to our descent below 10000 ft, the first officer and I discussed the need to be especially alert for light aircraft below the scattered cloud deck at about 8000 ft. All external aircraft lights were turned on. After passing turnr intersection, pbi approach turned us south and handed us off to mia approach control. We were heading 180 degrees at 6000 ft when approach advised us of a target in our 11-12 O'clock position at 5000 ft about 7-8 mi. We had this target intermittently on TCASII at this time. Approach then called out the traffic at about 5 mi and said it appeared to be maneuvering as its heading and altitude were constantly changing. I saw the traffic, a small red bi-wing airplane, low, at about 3-4 mi and it was heading in an easterly direction and appeared to be of no threat to us. The first officer advised approach that we had the traffic visually. The TCASII at this point showed a TA (yellow) 600 ft below us at 11-12 O'clock. It quickly turned to an RA (red) and gave the aural alert to 'monitor vertical speed' and showed a red arc below level flight (don't descend). At this point, with no warning (i.e., no clearing turns), the traffic abruptly pulled straight up to the vertical and was coming right at us. I disconnected the autoplt and started a right climbing turn almost simultaneously as the TCASII aural changed to 'climb, climb.' I was only able to turn about 10 degrees and climb 150 ft before we passed the traffic and the TCASII alert ceased. The first officer advised me the TCASII showed -02 during this maneuver. I estimated the horizontal separation was less than 500 ft as I could not see the other plane once I started evasive action. A 'near miss' was reported and I contacted mia approach control when on the ground by telephone with the pertinent information. I asked if that airplane was in an area where he was allowed to be performing acrobatics and was advised he was. Because of the thunderstorms, we were not on a route normally used by commercial aircraft so it appears he was not expecting to see us. In any case, he did not perform any clearing turns prior to commencing an acrobatic maneuver. At this time, mia approach has not been able to identify who the other aircraft was. Mia approach control did an excellent job of issuing aircraft advisories and the TCASII performed commendably. I guess the next time I see a bi-wing aircraft I'll assume it's doing acrobatics and give it a little wider berth.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: MLG HAS NMAC WITH ACROBATIC BIPLANE.
Narrative: DUE TO TSTMS ON THE FLL APCH WE WERE VECTORED TO INTERCEPT THE HOMEY ARR INTO PBI AND TO EXPECT RADAR VECTORS WHEN PAST THE WX. AS PART OF MY NORMAL BRIEFING PROCS WHEN IN FLORIDA AND PRIOR TO OUR DSCNT BELOW 10000 FT, THE FO AND I DISCUSSED THE NEED TO BE ESPECIALLY ALERT FOR LIGHT ACFT BELOW THE SCATTERED CLOUD DECK AT ABOUT 8000 FT. ALL EXTERNAL ACFT LIGHTS WERE TURNED ON. AFTER PASSING TURNR INTXN, PBI APCH TURNED US S AND HANDED US OFF TO MIA APCH CTL. WE WERE HDG 180 DEGS AT 6000 FT WHEN APCH ADVISED US OF A TARGET IN OUR 11-12 O'CLOCK POS AT 5000 FT ABOUT 7-8 MI. WE HAD THIS TARGET INTERMITTENTLY ON TCASII AT THIS TIME. APCH THEN CALLED OUT THE TFC AT ABOUT 5 MI AND SAID IT APPEARED TO BE MANEUVERING AS ITS HDG AND ALT WERE CONSTANTLY CHANGING. I SAW THE TFC, A SMALL RED BI-WING AIRPLANE, LOW, AT ABOUT 3-4 MI AND IT WAS HDG IN AN EASTERLY DIRECTION AND APPEARED TO BE OF NO THREAT TO US. THE FO ADVISED APCH THAT WE HAD THE TFC VISUALLY. THE TCASII AT THIS POINT SHOWED A TA (YELLOW) 600 FT BELOW US AT 11-12 O'CLOCK. IT QUICKLY TURNED TO AN RA (RED) AND GAVE THE AURAL ALERT TO 'MONITOR VERT SPD' AND SHOWED A RED ARC BELOW LEVEL FLT (DON'T DSND). AT THIS POINT, WITH NO WARNING (I.E., NO CLRING TURNS), THE TFC ABRUPTLY PULLED STRAIGHT UP TO THE VERT AND WAS COMING RIGHT AT US. I DISCONNECTED THE AUTOPLT AND STARTED A R CLBING TURN ALMOST SIMULTANEOUSLY AS THE TCASII AURAL CHANGED TO 'CLB, CLB.' I WAS ONLY ABLE TO TURN ABOUT 10 DEGS AND CLB 150 FT BEFORE WE PASSED THE TFC AND THE TCASII ALERT CEASED. THE FO ADVISED ME THE TCASII SHOWED -02 DURING THIS MANEUVER. I ESTIMATED THE HORIZ SEPARATION WAS LESS THAN 500 FT AS I COULD NOT SEE THE OTHER PLANE ONCE I STARTED EVASIVE ACTION. A 'NEAR MISS' WAS RPTED AND I CONTACTED MIA APCH CTL WHEN ON THE GND BY TELEPHONE WITH THE PERTINENT INFO. I ASKED IF THAT AIRPLANE WAS IN AN AREA WHERE HE WAS ALLOWED TO BE PERFORMING ACROBATICS AND WAS ADVISED HE WAS. BECAUSE OF THE TSTMS, WE WERE NOT ON A RTE NORMALLY USED BY COMMERCIAL ACFT SO IT APPEARS HE WAS NOT EXPECTING TO SEE US. IN ANY CASE, HE DID NOT PERFORM ANY CLRING TURNS PRIOR TO COMMENCING AN ACROBATIC MANEUVER. AT THIS TIME, MIA APCH HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO IDENT WHO THE OTHER ACFT WAS. MIA APCH CTL DID AN EXCELLENT JOB OF ISSUING ACFT ADVISORIES AND THE TCASII PERFORMED COMMENDABLY. I GUESS THE NEXT TIME I SEE A BI-WING ACFT I'LL ASSUME IT'S DOING ACROBATICS AND GIVE IT A LITTLE WIDER BERTH.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.