37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 287322 |
Time | |
Date | 199411 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : n90 airport : teb |
State Reference | NY |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 5700 msl bound upper : 6600 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | cruise other ground : parked |
Route In Use | enroute airway : n90 |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 120 flight time total : 750 flight time type : 10 |
ASRS Report | 287322 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : private |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe altitude deviation : excursion from assigned altitude inflight encounter : weather non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Departed een IFR for teb. Icing occurred at 3 times during the flight, requiring either a climb or descent. The wind was strong with a SIGMET issued for moderate to severe turbulence and low level wind shear. The person I was flying with owned the aircraft we were in and is also instrument rated. He was PIC of the whole flight. At times we had altdevs of 600- 300 ft. Partly due to the PIC's plting technique but mostly due to the conditions. Several times controllers asked us about our altitude or just gave us an altimeter setting. Just over the hudson river, or thereabouts, the manifold pressure gauge failed. This had no bearing on the outcome of the flight. Descending to teb we broke out at 3100 ft MSL and were hit with severe turbulence which made control very difficult. Several times we went through the approach but were in VFR condition at the time. We landed at teb without incident. The pilot was shaken up and I didn't look forward to returning unless conditions improved. A mechanic at FBO looked at the aircraft to make a diagnosis and fix the manifold pressure gauge.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: SMA ON IFR FLT PLAN HAS ALTDEV AND MANIFOLD PRESSURE GAUGE FAILURE.
Narrative: DEPARTED EEN IFR FOR TEB. ICING OCCURRED AT 3 TIMES DURING THE FLT, REQUIRING EITHER A CLB OR DSCNT. THE WIND WAS STRONG WITH A SIGMET ISSUED FOR MODERATE TO SEVERE TURB AND LOW LEVEL WIND SHEAR. THE PERSON I WAS FLYING WITH OWNED THE ACFT WE WERE IN AND IS ALSO INST RATED. HE WAS PIC OF THE WHOLE FLT. AT TIMES WE HAD ALTDEVS OF 600- 300 FT. PARTLY DUE TO THE PIC'S PLTING TECHNIQUE BUT MOSTLY DUE TO THE CONDITIONS. SEVERAL TIMES CTLRS ASKED US ABOUT OUR ALT OR JUST GAVE US AN ALTIMETER SETTING. JUST OVER THE HUDSON RIVER, OR THEREABOUTS, THE MANIFOLD PRESSURE GAUGE FAILED. THIS HAD NO BEARING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE FLT. DSNDING TO TEB WE BROKE OUT AT 3100 FT MSL AND WERE HIT WITH SEVERE TURB WHICH MADE CTL VERY DIFFICULT. SEVERAL TIMES WE WENT THROUGH THE APCH BUT WERE IN VFR CONDITION AT THE TIME. WE LANDED AT TEB WITHOUT INCIDENT. THE PLT WAS SHAKEN UP AND I DIDN'T LOOK FORWARD TO RETURNING UNLESS CONDITIONS IMPROVED. A MECH AT FBO LOOKED AT THE ACFT TO MAKE A DIAGNOSIS AND FIX THE MANIFOLD PRESSURE GAUGE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.