37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 288627 |
Time | |
Date | 199411 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : slc |
State Reference | UT |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 6000 msl bound upper : 8500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : slc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | King Air C90 E90 |
Operating Under FAR Part | other : unknown |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : atp pilot : commercial pilot : flight engineer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 11000 flight time type : 6550 |
ASRS Report | 288627 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 180 flight time total : 17000 flight time type : 11000 |
ASRS Report | 288621 |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac non adherence : required legal separation non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 3000 vertical : 400 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error |
Narrative:
On radar vectors to runway 16 slc for a visual approach -- approach called out king air traffic on visual runway 17 crossing in front of us. We never saw aircraft or reported aircraft in sight. TCASII did pick up aircraft. Approach asked if we had runway in sight and we answered runway in sight and we were cleared for a visual for runway 16 as TCASII gave us an RA of climb 1500 FPM. TCASII showed traffic 400 ft below left wing of display aircraft. Climb to 8500 ft. Controller then asked if we could land. We were approaching end of runway at 8500 ft declined landing clearance and went around. On 2ND visual approach forgot to hand us off to tower and we had to ask to change frequencys. The controller made a comment that the traffic must have lined up on the wrong runway. The controller was extremely busy at the time of incident and also had a lifeguard flight to get into the airport. Supplemental information from acn: 288621: had center controller on jumpseat who got a great show of how it is on our side of the scope! -- Common practice to cross runway 17 traffic in front of runway 16 traffic -- understand it's because of noise policy of salt lake city -- that will not allow left traffic for runway 17! I guess a midair isn't too noisy.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: OPERROR? NMAC.
Narrative: ON RADAR VECTORS TO RWY 16 SLC FOR A VISUAL APCH -- APCH CALLED OUT KING AIR TFC ON VISUAL RWY 17 XING IN FRONT OF US. WE NEVER SAW ACFT OR RPTED ACFT IN SIGHT. TCASII DID PICK UP ACFT. APCH ASKED IF WE HAD RWY IN SIGHT AND WE ANSWERED RWY IN SIGHT AND WE WERE CLRED FOR A VISUAL FOR RWY 16 AS TCASII GAVE US AN RA OF CLB 1500 FPM. TCASII SHOWED TFC 400 FT BELOW L WING OF DISPLAY ACFT. CLB TO 8500 FT. CTLR THEN ASKED IF WE COULD LAND. WE WERE APCHING END OF RWY AT 8500 FT DECLINED LNDG CLRNC AND WENT AROUND. ON 2ND VISUAL APCH FORGOT TO HAND US OFF TO TWR AND WE HAD TO ASK TO CHANGE FREQS. THE CTLR MADE A COMMENT THAT THE TFC MUST HAVE LINED UP ON THE WRONG RWY. THE CTLR WAS EXTREMELY BUSY AT THE TIME OF INCIDENT AND ALSO HAD A LIFEGUARD FLT TO GET INTO THE ARPT. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN: 288621: HAD CTR CTLR ON JUMPSEAT WHO GOT A GREAT SHOW OF HOW IT IS ON OUR SIDE OF THE SCOPE! -- COMMON PRACTICE TO CROSS RWY 17 TFC IN FRONT OF RWY 16 TFC -- UNDERSTAND IT'S BECAUSE OF NOISE POLICY OF SALT LAKE CITY -- THAT WILL NOT ALLOW L TFC FOR RWY 17! I GUESS A MIDAIR ISN'T TOO NOISY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.