37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 291591 |
Time | |
Date | 199412 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : rno |
State Reference | NV |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 6000 msl bound upper : 15000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : rno tower : dpa |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | MD-80 Super 80 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 250 flight time total : 15000 flight time type : 1200 |
ASRS Report | 291591 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
We picked up an md-80 in rno for the flight from rno-pdx. It was a cold airplane when we arrived at the gate. The first officer performed a walk-around while I did the originating cockpit checks. Since the airplane had sat overnight, it was necessary to service the lavatories, potable water, and de-ice the aircraft. After this was completed, a second exterior inspection was done prior to departure. After takeoff, prior to reaching 10000 ft, the cabin called and said that they had a massive pressure leak at the right rear emergency exit. I noted that the cabin was climbing at a faster rate than normal and was not holding normal pressurization. I proceeded back to the cabin to visually inspect the situation. It was quite evident that it would be necessary to return to rno. The noise level was so great that it was nearly impossible to talk within 6 rows of the leak. I returned to the cockpit and we informed approach that we would need to return to rno. I also made a PA informing the passenger of our plan to return. The approach and landing were uneventful. After arriving at the gate, maintenance found that the emergency exit was not properly installed. At no time while we were on the aircraft was the emergency exit removed. It was inspected from the exterior twice before departure and appeared flush and properly installed. The flight attendants also checked it from the interior and everything was normal in appearance.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLC OF AN MLG RETURNED AND LANDED AFTER HEARING A LOUD AIR NOISE AROUND A REAR EMER EXIT DOOR AND DIFFICULTY IN ACFT PRESSURIZATION.
Narrative: WE PICKED UP AN MD-80 IN RNO FOR THE FLT FROM RNO-PDX. IT WAS A COLD AIRPLANE WHEN WE ARRIVED AT THE GATE. THE FO PERFORMED A WALK-AROUND WHILE I DID THE ORIGINATING COCKPIT CHKS. SINCE THE AIRPLANE HAD SAT OVERNIGHT, IT WAS NECESSARY TO SVC THE LAVATORIES, POTABLE WATER, AND DE-ICE THE ACFT. AFTER THIS WAS COMPLETED, A SECOND EXTERIOR INSPECTION WAS DONE PRIOR TO DEP. AFTER TKOF, PRIOR TO REACHING 10000 FT, THE CABIN CALLED AND SAID THAT THEY HAD A MASSIVE PRESSURE LEAK AT THE R REAR EMER EXIT. I NOTED THAT THE CABIN WAS CLBING AT A FASTER RATE THAN NORMAL AND WAS NOT HOLDING NORMAL PRESSURIZATION. I PROCEEDED BACK TO THE CABIN TO VISUALLY INSPECT THE SIT. IT WAS QUITE EVIDENT THAT IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO RETURN TO RNO. THE NOISE LEVEL WAS SO GREAT THAT IT WAS NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO TALK WITHIN 6 ROWS OF THE LEAK. I RETURNED TO THE COCKPIT AND WE INFORMED APCH THAT WE WOULD NEED TO RETURN TO RNO. I ALSO MADE A PA INFORMING THE PAX OF OUR PLAN TO RETURN. THE APCH AND LNDG WERE UNEVENTFUL. AFTER ARRIVING AT THE GATE, MAINT FOUND THAT THE EMER EXIT WAS NOT PROPERLY INSTALLED. AT NO TIME WHILE WE WERE ON THE ACFT WAS THE EMER EXIT REMOVED. IT WAS INSPECTED FROM THE EXTERIOR TWICE BEFORE DEP AND APPEARED FLUSH AND PROPERLY INSTALLED. THE FLT ATTENDANTS ALSO CHKED IT FROM THE INTERIOR AND EVERYTHING WAS NORMAL IN APPEARANCE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.