37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 308077 |
Time | |
Date | 199506 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : dsm |
State Reference | IA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 31500 msl bound upper : 33000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zmp tower : cvg |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B757-200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Route In Use | enroute airway : zmp |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 70 flight time total : 21000 flight time type : 2200 |
ASRS Report | 308077 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 250 flight time total : 9850 flight time type : 1700 |
ASRS Report | 308117 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe altitude deviation : excursion from assigned altitude other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : overcame equipment problem flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course other |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
In cruise at FL330, in and out of cloud tops in occasional light turbulence, our 757 pitched nose down and began a descent. Both the copilot and I grabbed the yoke. The altitude alert warning went off (300 ft below 330). I disconnected the autoplt. The plane was out of trim nose down. I saw the spdbrake lever extended 3/4 full, cycling between half and 3/4 extension. I grabbed the lever and pushed toward retract. There was resistance. It wanted to extend. Finally the lever stayed stowed and airspeed increased momentarily to high speed buffet, but no overspd occurred. At FL315 we regained full control with electric yoke trim and began climb back to FL330. We advised ATC of incident. At FL330 we tried to assess the problem. No logic for the incident was reasonable, but it all occurred in rapid succession. We notified air carrier system maintenance by radio and they had no history of a similar problem on the aircraft. They notified our maintenance at our destination. Flight attendants noted no injuries to anyone, but food and drinks were spilled -- probably at onset of descent. At destination plane was hand flown to manual spdbrake landing to avoid any recurrence of automatic extension at low altitude. Exiting runway, spdbrake lever was manually retracted and made a noisy thump as it passed the automatic armed detent. I showed this to the mechanic at the gate. Until the incident, the flight was normal. There was no takeoff warning, and spdbrakes had not been used to that point. Crew response was rapid, and copilot's assistance was very helpful. I have no logical explanation for this problem, since system are designed to prevent such an occurrence. We pulled the automatic spdbrake circuit breaker and got an amber automatic spdbrake inoperative warning (normal). Resetting the circuit breaker, the warning went out (normal). Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the captain said that maintenance changed part of the spdbrake mechanism, but nobody seems to know exactly what caused the initial part of the problem. He now knows that the autoplt was trimming nose down to counteract the normal pitchup moment of the spdbrake deployment, but some people speculated that since the spdbrakes are fly- by-wire perhaps electro magnetic interference caused deployment. He feels that the recovery was aided by the use of electric trim as well as forcing the spdbrakes down. The captain said that this is the first unusual event that he has had with the B757-200 and since this occurrence he has flown this aircraft several times. He does not think that there was any wake turbulence associated with this event. Callback conversation with reporter acn 308117 revealed the following information: this callback was in conjuction with multi-engine turbojet incident callback questionnaire. The autoplt disconnected automatically because of protective aircraft systems. The recovery maneuver was smooth and the event not noticed by passenger. Reporter subscribes highly to unusual attitude training.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACFT EQUIP PROB -- THE SPDBRAKES AUTO-DEPLOYED DURING CRUISE ON THIS ACR AND IT LOST 1500 FT IN THE RECOVERY.
Narrative: IN CRUISE AT FL330, IN AND OUT OF CLOUD TOPS IN OCCASIONAL LIGHT TURB, OUR 757 PITCHED NOSE DOWN AND BEGAN A DSCNT. BOTH THE COPLT AND I GRABBED THE YOKE. THE ALT ALERT WARNING WENT OFF (300 FT BELOW 330). I DISCONNECTED THE AUTOPLT. THE PLANE WAS OUT OF TRIM NOSE DOWN. I SAW THE SPDBRAKE LEVER EXTENDED 3/4 FULL, CYCLING BTWN HALF AND 3/4 EXTENSION. I GRABBED THE LEVER AND PUSHED TOWARD RETRACT. THERE WAS RESISTANCE. IT WANTED TO EXTEND. FINALLY THE LEVER STAYED STOWED AND AIRSPD INCREASED MOMENTARILY TO HIGH SPD BUFFET, BUT NO OVERSPD OCCURRED. AT FL315 WE REGAINED FULL CTL WITH ELECTRIC YOKE TRIM AND BEGAN CLB BACK TO FL330. WE ADVISED ATC OF INCIDENT. AT FL330 WE TRIED TO ASSESS THE PROB. NO LOGIC FOR THE INCIDENT WAS REASONABLE, BUT IT ALL OCCURRED IN RAPID SUCCESSION. WE NOTIFIED ACR SYS MAINT BY RADIO AND THEY HAD NO HISTORY OF A SIMILAR PROB ON THE ACFT. THEY NOTIFIED OUR MAINT AT OUR DEST. FLT ATTENDANTS NOTED NO INJURIES TO ANYONE, BUT FOOD AND DRINKS WERE SPILLED -- PROBABLY AT ONSET OF DSCNT. AT DEST PLANE WAS HAND FLOWN TO MANUAL SPDBRAKE LNDG TO AVOID ANY RECURRENCE OF AUTO EXTENSION AT LOW ALT. EXITING RWY, SPDBRAKE LEVER WAS MANUALLY RETRACTED AND MADE A NOISY THUMP AS IT PASSED THE AUTO ARMED DETENT. I SHOWED THIS TO THE MECH AT THE GATE. UNTIL THE INCIDENT, THE FLT WAS NORMAL. THERE WAS NO TKOF WARNING, AND SPDBRAKES HAD NOT BEEN USED TO THAT POINT. CREW RESPONSE WAS RAPID, AND COPLT'S ASSISTANCE WAS VERY HELPFUL. I HAVE NO LOGICAL EXPLANATION FOR THIS PROB, SINCE SYS ARE DESIGNED TO PREVENT SUCH AN OCCURRENCE. WE PULLED THE AUTO SPDBRAKE CIRCUIT BREAKER AND GOT AN AMBER AUTO SPDBRAKE INOP WARNING (NORMAL). RESETTING THE CIRCUIT BREAKER, THE WARNING WENT OUT (NORMAL). CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE CAPT SAID THAT MAINT CHANGED PART OF THE SPDBRAKE MECHANISM, BUT NOBODY SEEMS TO KNOW EXACTLY WHAT CAUSED THE INITIAL PART OF THE PROB. HE NOW KNOWS THAT THE AUTOPLT WAS TRIMMING NOSE DOWN TO COUNTERACT THE NORMAL PITCHUP MOMENT OF THE SPDBRAKE DEPLOYMENT, BUT SOME PEOPLE SPECULATED THAT SINCE THE SPDBRAKES ARE FLY- BY-WIRE PERHAPS ELECTRO MAGNETIC INTERFERENCE CAUSED DEPLOYMENT. HE FEELS THAT THE RECOVERY WAS AIDED BY THE USE OF ELECTRIC TRIM AS WELL AS FORCING THE SPDBRAKES DOWN. THE CAPT SAID THAT THIS IS THE FIRST UNUSUAL EVENT THAT HE HAS HAD WITH THE B757-200 AND SINCE THIS OCCURRENCE HE HAS FLOWN THIS ACFT SEVERAL TIMES. HE DOES NOT THINK THAT THERE WAS ANY WAKE TURB ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR ACN 308117 REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THIS CALLBACK WAS IN CONJUCTION WITH MULTI-ENGINE TURBOJET INCIDENT CALLBACK QUESTIONNAIRE. THE AUTOPLT DISCONNECTED AUTOMATICALLY BECAUSE OF PROTECTIVE ACFT SYSTEMS. THE RECOVERY MANEUVER WAS SMOOTH AND THE EVENT NOT NOTICED BY PAX. RPTR SUBSCRIBES HIGHLY TO UNUSUAL ATTITUDE TRNG.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.